|
4th May 2017, 08:12 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 181
|
Quick question _ sudanese kaskara
I have purchased my first kaskara. I must admit that my knowlage about these swords is very limited. I am also a little suprised how much sword I actually got for my money. It really quite large (106cm) and heavy.
So I would like to know if anyone could point me towards the age of the sword. I know these swords kan be anything from 19th century to late 20th century. Any other information you can share about the sword would also be appreciated. Sorry about the fuzzy picture. |
5th May 2017, 08:56 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,430
|
There are others on the forum who know more about these than me, but it looks a good old sword... congratulations. I would say its mid to late 19th century.
Hopefully someone will be able to translate the inscription, and give you more information. |
5th May 2017, 01:11 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,693
|
Good example, its 19th century. The blade is from the Solingen maker Peter Kull and a pattern from the mid 19th century.
Can't help on the inscription but usually these are verses from the Koran. This a nice example of a typical Solingen export blade, simple but well made that were sent in the thousands to Africa. |
5th May 2017, 01:40 PM | #4 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 181
|
Quote:
|
|
6th May 2017, 01:01 PM | #5 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,693
|
Quote:
Quite a few blade of this exact pattern can be found in kaskara and more occasionally takouba. Sometimes the stamps were locally filled with copper. |
|
6th May 2017, 04:42 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 408
|
I usually defer to Iain's superior knowledge and experience, but the blade doesn't necessarily look to me like a factory forged piece as would have been made in Solingen. It looks to be pretty (too?) thick for a few inches near the guard, but does appear to taper toward the tip. Is the blade stiff or flexible?
Also, the maker's marks and inscriptions are deep and don't appear to made into a hardened surface. Could the blade be made of a softer steel closer to wrought iron and produced outside a factory setting? Please correct me if my ignorance is showing. Regards, Ed |
7th May 2017, 08:38 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sweden
Posts: 181
|
Thank you again for your time and knowledge.
I have some more information. There is actually text on both sides of the blade, I have not noticed before because it is barly visable, it appers to by similar to the one in the earlier photos I posted. There is also a star close to that text that i slightly more visable, I have added a photo of it. There is also a makers mark identical identical to the first one posted on the oposite side under the crossguard, it is a bit higher up then the first. |
7th May 2017, 07:46 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,693
|
The star is locally engraved (rather than stamped).
I know its tempting to imagine that due to the somewhat cruder look of this blade its not an industrial product. However even prior to the industriall revolution water powered trip hammers and grinders were the norm for forges in Medieval Italy and Germany. Some are still around, at least in Northern Italy around Belluno. There was no massive effort to refine the lines, fullers etc. on these trade blades, so they do look a bit crude. However, having handled quite a few of the single fuller and triple fuller patterns from the 19th century, the difference in profile to earlier blades from the 18th, 17th is quite pronounced. The 19th century blades, particularly this Kull pattern has a very flat profile with almost no lenticular cross section. Of course when you go further back the 15th and 14th century examples which very, very occasionally crop up (at least in takouba), the difference become even more pronounced. See the reference below. The three marks in question are noted as 1847 (72, 73, 74). This is not bad as far as kaskara blades go to be honest! From memory I think Kull may have been listed as a retailer and could well have outsourced production to multiple forges as his name and marks appear on a wide range of blades including military sabres. |
8th May 2017, 03:18 AM | #9 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,946
|
Iain, I recall our discussions several years back, and we talked about the Solingen marketing acumen, and the potential of these kinds of blades destined for North African interests. The groupings of these long venerated markings from earlier smiths and blades were often keenly appreciated by the traders at these entrepots in Africa as imbuements of power and quality (=magic).
As with most 'trade' weapons to native clientele in colonial situations, the quality was often subordinate to the typically notable quality weapons for the European markets. As we earlier noted, the overblown Solingen industry pretty much ran into steep decline with the rather abrupt end of the Franco-Prussian war and the shops scrambled to find sources for their wares. |
|
|