|
25th February 2015, 10:39 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,183
|
Yari
picked up this yari head via ebay last night a lot cheaper than i expected. it is shown in the picture on a three foot dowel of the wrong size. after earlier conversations with the vendor, i learned it was not tanged like most but socketed, which was as far as i know a bit unusual (?). anyway, i will order a 2 meter pole for it when i measure the socket & black lacquer it, etc.
i seem to remember that naganata and yari hafts had a flat area near the grip to aid in edge alignment, i would assume vertically for the nags and horizontal for yaris? thanks in advance for any info, these are somewhat outside my past area of knowledge. |
25th February 2015, 03:19 PM | #2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,497
|
Quote:
|
|
25th February 2015, 07:43 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,183
|
thanks. i'm a bit relieved. however real or repro, i'll love it and pet it and hug it and squeeze it and name it george*... i am a happy monster.
especially if it has a temper line i got the bunny rabbit, not the duck Last edited by kronckew; 25th February 2015 at 07:53 PM. |
25th February 2015, 08:15 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,079
|
Apparently the Satsuma Clan had a liking for Fukuro Yari because they were easier to re-shaft than the tanged type.
According to one of the curators at Leeds Royal Armoury a batch were also made for the Shogunate Army during the Bakamatsu period, ie the period when Japan's isolation was ending. |
25th February 2015, 08:48 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,183
|
i'll look for a broad arrow i will give it a bath in orange juice in honour of the clan.
|
26th February 2015, 02:44 AM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
Quote:
I don't know how common flat areas were/are on yari hafts. I've seen hafts without such, even for yari you might care about blade alignment with. (Equilateral triangular section and square section yari might as well have round hafts; you won't care about blade alignment. Also often cavalry lances, so the "usual" flat area near the butt won't be near the hand.) |
|
26th February 2015, 06:02 AM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,497
|
Quote:
|
|
26th February 2015, 09:13 AM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
Quote:
The "flat area", I guess, refers to having one side (matching the flat of a flattened sankaku yari) of the round haft planed flat near the butt. Hanwei makes a point of this in their ad copy for their reproduction yari, and their yari indeed are so. However, their haft is also uniform in thickness, not tapered like typical yari hafts, so their hafts are not so representative of historical examples. Is it correct to say that kikuchi yari are yari because they're mounted like yari, rather than being mounted like naginata (in which case, they'd be short straight naginata)? |
|
26th February 2015, 11:05 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,183
|
excellent info.
i'll try to find an appropriate tapered haft. like a long bo. if i find a locally made one, it will of course be an english long bo. |
27th February 2015, 01:16 AM | #10 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,497
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
27th February 2015, 05:12 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 422
|
To simplify, we could say that until mid-Heian, spears (hoko) were the most popular polearms, mid-Heian to early Muromachi naginata, and mid-Muromachi onwards, spears (yari). Possibly accompanied by changes in battle from close-order, to open-order, and back to close-order. It's a bit complicated, because
(a) "hoko" is also used to mean "polearm" in general, as well as a hoko spear, (b) "naginata" is literally "long sword", 長刀, and might refer to long swords in literature. References to drawing naginata (rather than "removing") might mean sword, not polearm. At the time when naginata appear to have been the most popular polearm, polearms weren't that popular (the Mongol Invasion Scrolls have a couple of naginata, but the dominant weapons are bow and tachi (as a sidearm). So perhaps it isn't a case of naginata replacing spears for a while, but rather that spears just stopped appearing on the battlefield, and the few naginata had no competition. Also, Kamakura naginata appear to have been much straighter than late naginata, and should not be hard to thrust with effectively. Looks like the more curved naginata appear when the yari does - instead of a single cut/thrust polearm, we have more a division into specialised cutting and thrusting polearms. Don't know what any of that means for kikuchi yari. I haven't seen a kukichi yari blade of more than tanto length, so they're not much like early naginata. Here's an Edo period socketed kikuchi yari: http://www.e-sword.jp/sale/2013/1310_4035syousai.htm ; compare with fukuro naginata and you see a clear difference: this yari has a round socket, and fukuro naginata have oval sockets. (Karl Friday says the difference between hoko and yari (other than sockets vs tangs) is that hoko have grippy hafts (spiral wrapped, not smooth) while yari have smooth hafts. You pool-cue thrust with a yari, not with a hoko. See "Samurai, Warfare and the State", and http://www.e-budo.com/forum/showthre...ting-technique for his comments.) |
|
|