Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 25th September 2014, 11:55 AM   #1
Sid
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 6
Default Ron Genduru or Ron Pakis

Dear All,


Please help me to identified the feature of this keris.
I've asked many people about its pamor, and the answers divided between Ron Genduru or Ron pakis.
Based on your observation, what type of pamor it is? and could you please give a brief explanation why it fall into this category (pamor)?
What type of wood that used for warangka?
and the last one, anyone could give me the best estimate of its tangguh?

Thank you for help.
Regards
Attached Images
  
Sid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2014, 04:48 AM   #2
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,121
Default

Hi Sid. You haven't really shown us any detailed shots to help us answer your questions. Better images might help, but you blade looks fairly contemporary to me. The pamor patterns you ask about are rather similar and i am sure you will receive varying responses to the name game. Still, i would think good, sharp close-ups are necessary for the debate to even begin.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2014, 04:09 PM   #3
GIO
Member
 
GIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 313
Default

My opinion: recent Surakarta style keris, pamor Ron pakis. Wood hardly recognizable.
GIO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2014, 11:51 PM   #4
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,890
Default

I do not know what I'm looking at here.

The blade might be current era, but it could also be early 20th century

The pamor could be one of several types of ron duru, it might be ron pakis, but since this is a Jatim keris (includes Madura) it is most likely bulu ayam. It may also be one of several other pamors that are made in like fashion. To give an opinion I would need to examine the construction with a loupe.

The wood displays high chatoyancy but it is impossible to form any sort of opinion on the basis of photos. If this were a new or recent wrongko I'd perhaps take a punt on akasia, but it does not appear to be recent.

The pendok , jejeran dan mendak are all relatively recent, possibly 1980's.

Even with very, very good photos I would be reluctant to commit a definite opinion on this keris.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.