![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Aug 2010 
				Location: Sydney Australia 
				
				
					Posts: 228
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I bought this at auction a short while back. It's in a nice condition. It is old and appears to be stone carved. Surprisingly light though for such a large club.  It still has the fibre on the handle, and this shows a fair bit of age.  
		
		
		
			I've concluded this is a Tongan apa'apai. However, I'm not entirely sure. It has very little ornament. It is big. That's about all I know about it. If anybody knows what it is and has anything more to add, I'd appreciate your comments.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: What is still UK 
				
				
					Posts: 5,925
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Ron,  this thread shows illustrations of similar form clubs.  Close ups and sizes might help?  The binding might suggest Solomon Islands? 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...elanesian+club  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Aug 2010 
				Location: Sydney Australia 
				
				
					Posts: 228
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hi Tim 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Thanks for your response. There are obviously clubs in those illustrations that vaguely fit the profile of my club. But I still have no real idea of what it is. I am going to stick my neck out and assert it must be early to mid 19th century. It has a fair bit of wear and a pretty interesting patina. I have a small Solomon Islands 'Malaita' club with the some sort of fibre binding. So you may be correct on that attribution. This 'pole club' is pretty workmanlike. It certainly has a great balance. It is light as a feather. I have no idea what sort of wood it might be. It's certainly not palm. It has some blackening which has been coming off over time. But I'll add a close-up or two a little later.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Sep 2008 
				Location: San Gabriel Foothills, Southern California 
				
				
					Posts: 94
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hi Ron, 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	I'm not sure from the pics, but is the top triangular with a semi rounded back? If so, because the size and the amount of weaving, you may have an older Samoan Kilikiti bat.http://collections.tepapa.govt.nz/Theme.aspx?irn=2188 regards, Joe  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Aug 2010 
				Location: Sydney Australia 
				
				
					Posts: 228
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hi Joe 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Golly gosh, I think you are right. That is disappointing. A cricket bat! That's just not cricket. Cricket bats should look like cricket bats. I don't collect cricket bats, I collect clubs Thank you for your insight. Ron  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Aug 2010 
				Location: Sydney Australia 
				
				
					Posts: 228
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			This is an immensely useful forum. Thank you, everyone. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	This must be a 19th century kilikiti and it seems and it could've originated from a number of places in Polynesia, including Samoa and New Zealand. I will hang onto this. It isn't what it appeared so obviously to be – a club. However, it is interesting nonetheless. Beware of presumption. It will trip you up every time!  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |