![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 228
|
![]()
I bought this at auction a short while back. It's in a nice condition. It is old and appears to be stone carved. Surprisingly light though for such a large club. It still has the fibre on the handle, and this shows a fair bit of age.
I've concluded this is a Tongan apa'apai. However, I'm not entirely sure. It has very little ornament. It is big. That's about all I know about it. If anybody knows what it is and has anything more to add, I'd appreciate your comments. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,824
|
![]()
Ron, this thread shows illustrations of similar form clubs. Close ups and sizes might help? The binding might suggest Solomon Islands?
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...elanesian+club |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 228
|
![]()
Hi Tim
Thanks for your response. There are obviously clubs in those illustrations that vaguely fit the profile of my club. But I still have no real idea of what it is. I am going to stick my neck out and assert it must be early to mid 19th century. It has a fair bit of wear and a pretty interesting patina. I have a small Solomon Islands 'Malaita' club with the some sort of fibre binding. So you may be correct on that attribution. This 'pole club' is pretty workmanlike. It certainly has a great balance. It is light as a feather. I have no idea what sort of wood it might be. It's certainly not palm. It has some blackening which has been coming off over time. But I'll add a close-up or two a little later. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Gabriel Foothills, Southern California
Posts: 94
|
![]()
Hi Ron,
I'm not sure from the pics, but is the top triangular with a semi rounded back? If so, because the size and the amount of weaving, you may have an older Samoan Kilikiti bat.http://collections.tepapa.govt.nz/Theme.aspx?irn=2188 regards, Joe |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 228
|
![]()
Hi Joe
Golly gosh, I think you are right. That is disappointing. A cricket bat! That's just not cricket. Cricket bats should look like cricket bats. I don't collect cricket bats, I collect clubs Thank you for your insight. Ron |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 228
|
![]()
This is an immensely useful forum. Thank you, everyone.
This must be a 19th century kilikiti and it seems and it could've originated from a number of places in Polynesia, including Samoa and New Zealand. I will hang onto this. It isn't what it appeared so obviously to be – a club. However, it is interesting nonetheless. Beware of presumption. It will trip you up every time! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|