|
12th November 2024, 08:31 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 541
|
Where's the Wootz?
I find this a deep and impenetrable issue which has perplexed me from the start, and continues to do so, despite reading everything I can find, and now watching all the postings on Youtube.
This question I ask here is focused and coherent: "Was the 'Crucible Method' used to produce steel in the Middle-East; as opposed to the common and typical 'billet-welding'. Plus, are there examples of sword blades made from such steel, and how do we tell. Pertinently, I am not talking about blades made from Wootz produced in India and Sri Lanka then exported along the Silk Roads; I refer, specifically, to crucible steel made in the Middle East. Perhaps someone has absorbed and assimilated all the - often contradictory - theses out there. I hope so. It has taken me a long time to firmly grasp the production method, but the above remains elusive. With thanks in anticipation. ps Hi Jim. |
Yesterday, 06:30 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 187
|
I am not sure I fully understand what you are asking. There are plenty of wootz blades that were made in places like Iran. For example the famous "Assad Allah of Isfahan" blades. Are you asking were they made in Iran, from wootz steel that was produced in Iran or were they made in Iran from wootz steel that was produced in India?
I am not a wootz scholar, but my assumption was that the wootz steel was also produced in the middle-east, not just India. Cheers, Bryce |
Yesterday, 08:27 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 541
|
Quote:
Pertinently, I am not talking about blades made from Wootz produced in India and Sri Lanka then exported along the Silk Roads; I refer, specifically, to crucible steel made in the Middle East.
|
Yesterday, 08:28 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 541
|
It is a bit ambiguous, I agree.
|
Yesterday, 04:04 PM | #5 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,952
|
I think the issue at hand is, as crucible steel is in essence produced in the same manner as the mysterious 'wootz' of Middle East, India but in the west. So the question, in my 'lay' perception is.....how are the smelted products of these versions of steel different?
If I understand correctly, the smelted steel becomes ingots, and these ingots of iron fashioned into carburized steel are then used to forge blades. Then it becomes the manner in which the raw steel is forged, with proper tempering, temperatures, quenching etc. As can be seen, my understanding of these important factors in the making of blades is hopelessly basic as my knowledge of edged weapons is more historic and of swords in finished product. The steel, its differences and characteristics is most important, and I admit its complexity has intimidated me to the point of avoidance. If I have understood, the 'wootz' steel was produced in the Middle East, but the furnaces in India and Sri Lanka produced the ingots which were traded to many blade making centers in other regions and cultures. In the same manner, steel produced in Sweden was a much traded and desired form which provided ingots to makers throughout Europe, England. I am not sure if the Swedish steel was crucible or not......ingots seem like they were more blockish, like bars of precious metal. How is crucible steel different from that produced in blast furnaces ? Again focused on western methods. |
Yesterday, 06:42 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 541
|
what's wootz
It is believed that Wootz was produced as far back as 800bCe in Southern India and Sri Lanka.
It is a hypereutectoid 'Crucible' steel: i.e. its temperature rises to the point where it melts and the organic additives included in the crucible, which was a "clay" watermelon shaped vessel, become evenly distributed, as opposed to folding and hammering. Those additives were rice husks, pomegranate peel, wood chips and leaves (?); also, it has been suggested that glass was added to homogenize impurities into a slag layer on top - but I remain uncertain as to the veracity of this suggestion. The forges were on hillsides, and tent-like funnels directed wind into the furnace to achieve the necessary temperatures. The resulting cakes of wootz could then be forged into blades given the appropriate knowledge and ability - which was not always a given. So, was this method practiced in the Middle East? That is my question. Surely this is known and established. Last edited by urbanspaceman; Yesterday at 07:13 PM. Reason: typo |
|
|