Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 24th March 2006, 04:16 AM   #1
Lew
(deceased)
 
Lew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
Default Interesting Salawar Yataghan For Comment

Hi Guys

Just picked this up tonight. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...ayphotohosting

The seller claims it says 1230 on the blade but it looks like 1930 to me? The liners look to me like Aluminum so in 1815 which is the corresponding year would be too far back for the maker to use that metal on the knife. Still an interesting piece.

Lew
Lew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2006, 05:08 AM   #2
not2sharp
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 210
Default

It looks like the blade may have been shortend to 12-inches from a more typical khyber length. Certainly, another one of those with a bit of history to it.

n2s
not2sharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2006, 05:20 AM   #3
Lew
(deceased)
 
Lew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by not2sharp
It looks like the blade may have been shortend to 12-inches from a more typical khyber length. Certainly, another one of those with a bit of history to it.

n2s
n2s
I must disagree the blade tip looks right and it has the right arc in the edge. If it were shortened the profile would be off. Its just a shortened form of that type of knife.

Lew
Lew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2006, 06:37 AM   #4
Yannis
Member
 
Yannis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Athens Greece
Posts: 479
Default

Very interesting piece.
IMHO it is 1930. Western calendar. It matches with latin letters. I suppose they used to give prestige to a local factory. Afghanis used to copy western rifles, british mostly, and their trademarks.
What it puzzles me are these marks like "cuts" on the hilt. They look they made after market and on purpose. They do not look like natural age marks. Did anyone was counting something?
Yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2006, 07:30 AM   #5
not2sharp
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yannis
Very interesting piece.
What it puzzles me are these marks like "cuts" on the hilt. They look they made after market and on purpose. They do not look like natural age marks. Did anyone was counting something?
I am not sure which marks you are referring to.

Can anyone identify the crest on the sheath?

n2s
not2sharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2006, 08:35 AM   #6
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

For inscription Razmak, see this:
http://www.queensroyalsurreys.org.uk...india45_1.html
Also " sellers" on top, and date 1930
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.