![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
|
![]()
Hello colleagues by collectors, I recently bought a dagger in one of the old collector and want to know your opinion.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 233
|
![]()
In my opinion, I think it's a modern build with imitation ageing applied.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
![]()
Hi Messia,
The state of corrosion seems natural to me. Otherwise it is the very best artificial aging I ever saw. I don't believe in artificial aging, because it would be pretty unusual for european blades. It also make no sense, to age the blade but not the hilt. I tend to believe it is a 19th century work. If you can find traces of laminating, the blade could be from 15th century. But this is almost impossible to judge from the pictures only. I added two pictures of genuine ear daggers. They are a clear evidence, that one cannot judge the age of a blade from its state of corrosion! Roland |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,198
|
![]()
I found the mark on the blade in " Wendelin Boeheim, Handbuch der Waffenkunde". But it might be difficult to decide wether it is an original mark or a fake............
corrado26 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 132
|
![]() Quote:
Solothurn Philadelphia |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|