new addition, origin is confusing

mavi1970 · 2nd May 2007, 06:55 PM

newly arrived purchase. leather scabbard, horn handle, the brass cover on the handle is loose but solder would fix that. no distinctive marks on sword. blade has one full blood groove, and one above which is about 4 inches long, but the blade does not look like it has been sharpened down to loose size, the second blood groove starts by fuller and ends 6 inches from fuller. blade has to be cleaned properly to see what kind it is. any ideas on origin? ukranian but no crests, islamic possibly?, or is it turkish/ottoman?

Lew · 2nd May 2007, 07:16 PM

Mavi

You need to post a picture

Lew

mavi1970 · 2nd May 2007, 07:44 PM

hehe, the attachments didnt come through, but here they are.
thanks

ariel · 2nd May 2007, 09:52 PM

It is unquestionably Turkish, second half of the 19th century, military. That's when the Turks decided to model their military after the European, in particular German example. Moltke, a young officer then, was put in charge.
The swords were modeled after the traditional Kilic Adjemi, that was uncannily similar to the European Mameluke swords ( surprise, surprise...). Initially, they had handmade blades, but toward the end of the century, there were more and more light, nickel-plated ones. the wire-stitching of the scabbards disappeared. The cross-guard with down-turned quillons is typical of the era.

mavi1970 · 2nd May 2007, 11:28 PM

Thanks Ariel, thats the answer I was hoping for hehe. I had seen pictures with officers from Turkey from the 19th century, and the downward facing quillions was the main reason this sword gave itself away as turkish. were these swords ever made with wootz, damascus blades? this one really doesnt have the nickel plated characteristics and look, and the way it has discoloured and pitted.

RSWORD · 3rd May 2007, 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ariel

It is unquestionably Turkish, second half of the 19th century, military. That's when the Turks decided to model their military after the European, in particular German example. Moltke, a young officer then, was put in charge.
The swords were modeled after the traditional Kilic Adjemi, that was uncannily similar to the European Mameluke swords ( surprise, surprise...). Initially, they had handmade blades, but toward the end of the century, there were more and more light, nickel-plated ones. the wire-stitching of the scabbards disappeared. The cross-guard with down-turned quillons is typical of the era.

Ariel,

I have run across 3 seperate examples like the sword pictured which had Caucasian marked blades. All 3, without scabbards, had a blade with a stamp just like the one, top center, on p. 334 of Atstatsuvurians book. What do you think the connection is?

ariel · 3rd May 2007, 04:35 AM

The markings you mentioned (p.334, in the middle) are Armenian, and Armenians were very prominent in all kinds of crafts in Turkey, Persia and the Caucasus. Both Astvatsaturyan and Miller indicate that most of the Tbilisi, Vladikavkaz and Akhaltsikhe swordmakers were ethnic Armenians. I have seen Turkish military sword identical to the one under discussion here with mass-produced blade that was stamped with Armenian family name (escapes me which

) as the owner of the factory. Great Geork Puruntsuzov was originally from Erzerum ( Turkey) and moved to the Russian-controlled Caucasus.
Interestingly, Caucasian blades with Armenian inscriptions are very rare: they seemed to make blades for everybody but refrained from owning (?) or using (?) them. Not a part of their culture? I never managed to understand it...

2nd May 2007, 06:55 PM	#1
mavi1970 Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: canada Posts: 90	new addition, origin is confusing newly arrived purchase. leather scabbard, horn handle, the brass cover on the handle is loose but solder would fix that. no distinctive marks on sword. blade has one full blood groove, and one above which is about 4 inches long, but the blade does not look like it has been sharpened down to loose size, the second blood groove starts by fuller and ends 6 inches from fuller. blade has to be cleaned properly to see what kind it is. any ideas on origin? ukranian but no crests, islamic possibly?, or is it turkish/ottoman?

2nd May 2007, 07:44 PM	#3
mavi1970 Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: canada Posts: 90	hehe, the attachments didnt come through, but here they are. thanks Attached Images

2nd May 2007, 07:16 PM	#2
Lew (deceased) Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: East Coast USA Posts: 3,191	Mavi You need to post a picture Lew

2nd May 2007, 09:52 PM	#4
ariel Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Posts: 5,503	It is unquestionably Turkish, second half of the 19th century, military. That's when the Turks decided to model their military after the European, in particular German example. Moltke, a young officer then, was put in charge. The swords were modeled after the traditional Kilic Adjemi, that was uncannily similar to the European Mameluke swords ( surprise, surprise...). Initially, they had handmade blades, but toward the end of the century, there were more and more light, nickel-plated ones. the wire-stitching of the scabbards disappeared. The cross-guard with down-turned quillons is typical of the era.

2nd May 2007, 11:28 PM	#5
mavi1970 Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: canada Posts: 90	Thanks Ariel, thats the answer I was hoping for hehe. I had seen pictures with officers from Turkey from the 19th century, and the downward facing quillions was the main reason this sword gave itself away as turkish. were these swords ever made with wootz, damascus blades? this one really doesnt have the nickel plated characteristics and look, and the way it has discoloured and pitted.

3rd May 2007, 04:35 AM	#7
ariel Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Posts: 5,503	The markings you mentioned (p.334, in the middle) are Armenian, and Armenians were very prominent in all kinds of crafts in Turkey, Persia and the Caucasus. Both Astvatsaturyan and Miller indicate that most of the Tbilisi, Vladikavkaz and Akhaltsikhe swordmakers were ethnic Armenians. I have seen Turkish military sword identical to the one under discussion here with mass-produced blade that was stamped with Armenian family name (escapes me which ) as the owner of the factory. Great Geork Puruntsuzov was originally from Erzerum ( Turkey) and moved to the Russian-controlled Caucasus. Interestingly, Caucasian blades with Armenian inscriptions are very rare: they seemed to make blades for everybody but refrained from owning (?) or using (?) them. Not a part of their culture? I never managed to understand it...