Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 21st January 2007, 07:44 AM   #1
FenrisWolf
Member
 
FenrisWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 181
Default Help with Arabic/Farsi translations?

Hello to the board!

I'm new here, and while I've been collecting ethnographic edged weapons for a while, my knowledge of them is fairly limited. I know enough to be able to usually figure out roughly where something originated (Africa, Asia, India, eic.), and I've managed to pick up a bit more specific knowledge about individual pieces, but for the most part I can't claim more than a layman's "Ooh! Pretty!" knowledge of blades.

That being said, I have several pieces in my collection I'd love to learn more about. One is a small dagger from the Middle East, probably Persia, with a plain hilt and a beautifully worked blade, complete with two inscriptions, one in Arabic and the other in (I think) Farsi. I took it into a local middle eastern deli, and they put me in touch with an Iranian gentlemen gave me a very rough translation. He said one side was a passage from the Koran, the other was an inscription from the smith, something along the lines of 'made in the manner of the sword of the prophet' or words to that effect, and what I *think* is a date. IF it is, and it's in the Arabic calender, it would date the blade to the 1500s. Anyway, here are some pics:







The other dagger I know much less about, other than to suspect it to be Italian, 18th or 19th century, and intended for less than savory purposes. There's no inscription, but there is a brass proofmark in the blade with a signature resembling a stylized man's face with mustache and goatee cut into the metal.



Any help with translating the inscriptions and/or identifying these two daggers will be greatly appreciated! And afterwards, if people don't object too strenuously, I have others I'd like to get people's opinions on (which is really a thinly veiled way of gloating and saying 'look what I got!', but you all knew that, right?)

Thanks in advance,
Fenris
FenrisWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2007, 05:01 PM   #2
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,293
Smile

Hi Fenris,

Pictures taken without flash would make it much easier to read the script; try shooting outside on a bright overcast day.

Your first piece has a handle that resembles a Bichaq's ; the second piece does, as you say, look like its intentions are less than savory; well put.

Welcome!

Rick
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2007, 09:42 PM   #3
TVV
Member
 
TVV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,625
Default

I cannot help with the inscription, but the first one looks like coming out of Trebizond - there were a few threads on daggers from this area.
Teodor
TVV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2007, 11:34 PM   #4
FenrisWolf
Member
 
FenrisWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick
Hi Fenris,

Pictures taken without flash would make it much easier to read the script; try shooting outside on a bright overcast day.

Your first piece has a handle that resembles a Bichaq's ; the second piece does, as you say, look like its intentions are less than savory; well put.

Welcome!

Rick
Hi, Rick! Thanks for the welcome to the board, and the suggestion for retaking the photos. I'll give it a shot and see what turns out. Question; given the condition of the blade, does the apparent date make sense? I'd love to believe that this actually dates to the 1500s, but just can't reconcile that much age with the more or less pristine condition of the blade.

Fenris
FenrisWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2007, 12:13 AM   #5
ham
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 190
Default

This dagger is certainly Eastern Turkish, probably from the Black Sea region as noted above.
There are a number of forum members who will be happy to read the inscription for you-- speaking strictly for myself I would ask that the photos be closeups and very clear, as the characters can be easily misunderstood if the detail is not precise.

Dating-- these are typically late 19th or early 20th century. Given the photos I can see no reason to suggest that this one dates any earlier.

Ham
ham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2007, 12:58 AM   #6
FenrisWolf
Member
 
FenrisWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ham
This dagger is certainly Eastern Turkish, probably from the Black Sea region as noted above.
There are a number of forum members who will be happy to read the inscription for you-- speaking strictly for myself I would ask that the photos be closeups and very clear, as the characters can be easily misunderstood if the detail is not precise.

Dating-- these are typically late 19th or early 20th century. Given the photos I can see no reason to suggest that this one dates any earlier.

Ham
Thanks! I tried retaking the pics, but Murphy as usual is giving me his undivided attention. In a city infamous for its unrelenting sunny days, today is dark, cloudy and rainy, enough so that even in the open a flash is necessary. I'll try again tomorrow.

Re the date: that's really what I suspected. If the blade showed more age I might be more inclined to accept that the '935' in one inscription referred to the date, but it's just too crisp and clean to support a much older provenance. The wear and tear on the wood hilt is definitely much more in keeping with something from the late 19th/early 20th centuries. Regardless, it's a sweet little dagger and I paid less than $100.00 for it, so I'm not complaining!

Fenris
FenrisWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2007, 01:27 AM   #7
FenrisWolf
Member
 
FenrisWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 181
Default New pics of inscriptions!

I managed to get decent pics of the inscriptions:





You can see what I thought was a date at the left of the second one. Thanks in advance for help with this!

Fenris
FenrisWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2007, 01:01 AM   #8
Jeff D
Member
 
Jeff D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 473
Default

Hi Fenris,

I think I see the numbers 933. The Turks had converted to our calendar in the late 19th century. I think this date is in fact 1933 C.E. .

Hope this helps.
Jeff
Jeff D is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.