![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 75
|
![]()
Good afternoon y'all. In having looked at several hundred pappenheimer and rapier images over the past month I've been intrigued by how much the length of the hilt seem to vary.
For example, in shayde78's recent wonderful thread on pappenheimer he posted the following image of his own sword (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=25744) He follows this by saying he is about 6'4. Meanwhile my hand (I'm 6'3) seems to be dwarfed by the hilt on my own pappenheimer. So my question is what is the reason for such a disparity in hilt sizes? I feel like if the purpose was for better sword balance then why not just change the pommel size? Or was this just to boost someone's ego by having the "bigger sword". Last edited by fernando; 7th April 2023 at 07:05 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Bristol
Posts: 104
|
![]()
I suspect that there are just variations, but possibly also driven by what you will be wearing on your hand. The C17th infantry swords I have (some hangers and a proto-mortuary sword) have small guards because I think the users would have bare hands or simple leather gloves. The cavalry weapons have bigger guards because I think they'd (ideally) be wearing thicker gauntlets or plate gauntlets if cuirassiers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 252
|
![]()
I have this thing which I suspect it could be a Swedish haudegen from the time of Lützen.
Measurements are something like 117cm total length, 93cm blade and 1495gr total weight. There is a thumb ring. The handle shows wire marks. The front edge seems to have been sharpened more often than the back. In spite of the huge size and weight, it handles nicely, specially with a gauntlet. It could be a Victorian monstruosity as well. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Romania
Posts: 314
|
![]()
The side branches on your rapier hilt remind me a bit of this An XI sword. Maybe inspiration. It could indeed be Victorian.
https://www.sabresempire.com/2012/01...armee.html?m=1 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Bristol
Posts: 104
|
![]()
My hand (not very big) in my Pappenheimer. This has a rapier blade, so may have been for civilian use.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 75
|
![]()
These things must have been a royal pain to lug around. The number of times day they must have gotten caught on a rail or doorframe is absurd.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 75
|
![]()
It seems like all of these pommels could moonlight as doorknobs.
Is that a feature of all Pappenheimers? Mine has the balance just in front of the guard with a 38 inch blade but the pommel still seems unwieldy for such a thin blade. My next question is this: is there a description of what a Pappenheimer is from the 17th century? Or was this just a name applied by later academics to the style of this time period. If there is period references, what are the features they name? And what are the features accepted by modern academics of what a Pappenheimer is besides a "shell" style guard? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Tyneside. North-East England
Posts: 530
|
![]()
This is all I know but I'm sure someone will have more... probably Jim.
This style of rapier is named for Field Marshal Gottfried Heinrich Graf (count) zu Pappenheim, Imperial Cavalry commander. A gilded pappenheimer rapier was carried by Swedish King Gustavus II Adolphus when he was killed at the Battle of Lutzen in 1632 and is preserved in the Stockholm Royal Armouries. Coincidentally, Field Marshal von Pappenheim was also killed in this battle. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|