|
23rd March 2009, 09:51 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
|
Arabic STAMP on tulwar blade
...it is actually a stamp - identical on both sides of the blade. Is it at all possible that the stamp was made by someone unfamiliar with written forms of Arabic? Copied imperfectly from another source (sometimes the case with coinage and carpets...)?
The blade is, I think, European and as you can see, was once set in a different hilt with blade supports. |
23rd March 2009, 11:55 PM | #2 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG)
Posts: 1,142
|
Quote:
on the first reading from right to left, as it's must be done two words; Allah - Mohamed second line; nothing to read, just waves that's set folks à + Dom |
|
24th March 2009, 04:29 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
|
... the wavy lines couldn't be a date could they? 1333 AH (1915 Gregorian approx.) ?
|
24th March 2009, 09:07 AM | #4 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,187
|
Quote:
arabic text is written right to left. made it difficult to come up with an arabic word processer of course if the stamper was illiterate in arabic... a chart: note the devanagari. edited: they write no's from left to right... Last edited by kronckew; 24th March 2009 at 09:37 AM. |
|
21st November 2011, 05:32 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 607
|
My feeling is that this blade is European, probably made in Solingen in the 1700s.
|
21st November 2011, 05:53 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
Posts: 227
|
I could be wrong but here is an idea... With supposed decline of Indian steel quality in the 19th century, many bladesmiths tried to add value to their product by adding Arabic inscriptions to their merchandise to replicate Persian and Ottoman blades, which were thought to be superior at that time. Unfortunately vast majority of these people were illiterate, and resorted to crudely copying inscriptions from existing blades. In my opinion, inscription of "Allah - Mohammed" may simply represent the only 2 words besides his own name that the blade maker actually knew how to spell and recognized them from an inscription seen on another blade. This would also explain the squiggly lines - they may be just a filler that to an untrained eye would also look like text. So, I agree with the original poster's assessment.
By the way, the blade seems to be of good quality, and the sword overall is quite nice. Too bad it's missing a pommel but this sure gives it a certain character. |
21st November 2011, 06:05 PM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Paris (FR*) Cairo (EG)
Posts: 1,142
|
Quote:
why not à + Dom |
|
21st November 2011, 11:30 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
|
|
22nd November 2011, 01:24 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 314
|
Now let's get real and solve this. No where on this blad it says Allah(الله), the only part that is inteligible is Mohammad (محمد ). Top line we have لم لا that with Mohammad after it does not really make much sense, but could be له لا. Right up untill the Brits took over India, India was ruled by mostly Muslim rulers, the Mughuls, the Persian Afshars and the Afghans, and Farsi/Dari was the language of the courts. So there is good chance of finding Arabic script on Indian blades. The chances of the blacksmith being illeterate or not knowing enough about proper writing is very high. If i'm to take a guess, the text closely resembles someone trying to write,
لا اله الا الله محمد رسول الله . |
|
|