![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,144
|
![]()
In a recent discussion of a Borneo mandau, mention was made of fine rattan on the hilt being more indicative of older manufacture than coarser rattan wrappings. This prompted me to look back at some of my Borneo swords and reconsider their age. In doing so, I came across the one shown below, which I acquired online in 2005 and was discussed here at that time. For present purposes I will refer to my sword as a parang naibur, although Albert van Zonneveld shows a similar sword in his book that is called langgai tinggang, and our Borneo experts may have other names they can offer too. My main point in posting this one again is to illustrate what I think is old and new about this sword.
First, I think the scabbard itself is old, possibly 19th C. The wood shows areas that had red pigment and lime decoration which have faded over time (Figures A–D). The scabbard has nice traditional carving near the throat and is bound with bands of narrow rattan that have been woven intricately into characteristic designs. These contrast with the simple wrap with wide rattan strips to which a fiber rope is attached. This rope forms a belt from which bear claws are suspended (Figures E, F), and the belt is completed with a plastic disk (Figure G) that hooks through a loop in the rope. I think this belt was likely added shortly before the sword was offered online. I am wondering whether the generalization about thin versus thick rattan for hilts may also apply here to the scabbard as well. The hilt is also likely to be a recent feature. Carved from wood in a traditional style, it lacks the elegance and refinement of older work, and the addition of bear fur was probably another attempt to enhance the online attractiveness of the item. The rattan wrapping on the hilt would seem to be of the “wider” variety mentioned in the mandau thread. The blade appears old, and I would date it with the scabbard as possibly 19th C. It has a dark patina with areas of stable old rust that are almost black (Figure B). The blade is well forged and straight, with a thickness of 7.5 mm just in front of the hilt and tapering smoothly to 3.0 mm where the spine turns down towards the cutting edge and the blade has a maximum width of 4.5 cm. A fuller is present on each side just below the spine of the blade—the fullers are well cut, of even width, and run parallel to the curved spine. This is a good quality blade made by a skilled craftsman. Along the spine of the blade are groups of lines with shallow brass inlay. These lines are widest closest to the hilt and narrowest near the tip. They are present in groups of 5—7—6—7—6—5 going from the hilt towards the tip (Figure C). Dimensions: Overall length = 61.5 cmIan . Last edited by Ian; 22nd February 2018 at 08:57 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
![]()
Hello Ian,
I generally agree with your assesment but would give more credit to the hilt. Of course you have it in front of you and can see much more details but to my eyes the hilt looks only maybe a couple of decades younger than the scabbard and blade. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,144
|
![]()
Marius,
Thanks for your thoughts. Much appreciated. I have attached another close up picture of the hilt. There is not much to be seen in terms of wear from handling or age. The carving is crisp with no chips, cracks, etc. Those are the things I was looking at when I said that I thought it was of recent manufacture. Does the rattan wrap help with assessing age in this case? Ian. . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,324
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||||||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,249
|
![]()
Hello Ian,
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() It is a type of Iban parang with symmetric edge (rather than a mandau with concave and convex sides); I don't believe we ever found a genuine name for this distinct type - maybe our member Primus can help with info from the source? Quote:
Regarding age, I'd guess it to be quite a bit later though. Just a hunch based on craftsmanship, materials, etc. Quote:
Quote:
The claws are certainly added very late: the remaining tissues would start rotting in a humid climate... Dito for the 3 smaller teeth. The larger teeth appear to be a bit older though. Quote:
Quote:
I hope others will chime in, too! Regards, Kai Last edited by kai; 23rd February 2018 at 07:38 AM. Reason: correcting auto correction... ;) |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,144
|
![]()
Hello Kai,
Thanks for your detailed response. The information is greatly appreciated. It is somehow refreshing to know that some things simply don't have a name! I was never happy with calling it a parang naibur, but could find nothing better in the sources I consulted. To learn that it has no recognized name is not surprising. I agree that the blade is rather plain, but at the same time it is well made and seems to have some age to it. The sword is quite light in the hand and well balanced. I'm planning to take this one with me to Australia, so I will likely remove the belt and the fur trim on the hilt. No sense in giving customs people things to be concerned about. I don't think that the loss of the belt and fur will detract from the item. ![]() Ian |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,249
|
![]()
Hello Ian,
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
There may be a point of depositing it in a museum... Regards, Kai |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,144
|
![]()
Thanks again Kai. Here are some pictures of the back of the scabbard with close ups of the rattan fittings.
I will not do anything drastic until hearing from more folks. ![]() Ian. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
It don t even come close to an parang nabur.
http://old.blades.free.fr/swords/day...ayak_intro.htm Ben Last edited by Dajak; 24th February 2018 at 10:21 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,249
|
![]()
You're welcome, Ian!
Quote:
![]() Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,324
|
![]() Quote:
Ofcourse the fine rattan work often is found on older hilts, and the plaited rattan on the more recent hilts is less intricate and coarser. Indeed, on the more recent hilts, almost never is seen such intricate fine rattanwork. But I have seen very old hilts with coarse rattanwork on the hilts. So the other way around this works not as an indicator imho. Kind regards, Maurice |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,324
|
![]() Quote:
I've seen very old collected Borneo swords with huge, thick, rattan bands around the scabbard! The scabbard could be older indeed, looking at the patina here and there (between the rattan knots), but probably the paint is more recent. The carving on the scabbard though has no patina at all. I would not be surprised if it is even a more recent scabbard. Quote:
Quote:
And if the blade does appear to be an old one, it is poorly crafted. These kind of parangs show up now and than in Malaysian collections nowadays. Nothing wrong with it, but not the antique parangs I would like to collect. Last edited by Maurice; 2nd March 2018 at 08:50 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|