Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11th October 2012, 11:38 PM   #1
Robert
EAAF Staff
 
Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
Default Bolo Re-Hash

I'm bringing up the discussion on this bolo in a new thread in hopes that some of our member who never saw the original post or maybe some of our newer members might have some new ideas of where and when this bolo was produced. I think that the pictures below are a little better than any of the ones previously posted and hope that they might better help in the identification of this piece. Any and all thoughts or information on this bolo would be greatly appreciated.

Regards,
Robert
Attached Images
            
Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2012, 03:42 AM   #2
Bangkaya
Member
 
Bangkaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 38
Cool

Hello Robert,
Your bolo seems to be an amalgamation of two cultures different Filipino ethnic groups. The sword and scabbard looks to be Waray in origin although with an usual blade form either from Leyte or Samar. The monkey skull and rattan binding comes from northern Luzon and is usually found on those tourist pinahigs of the Igorots. You'll notice that the skull and the binding is much darker since they smoke them under a fire to get them darker. It seems that someone put those together for some reason or another. I've never seen a Waray sword adorned with a monkey skull before. Interesting though.

Regards,
Bangkaya
Bangkaya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2012, 03:50 AM   #3
A Senefelder
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 214
Default

Not my area of expertise at all but the money skull reminds me of some of the few Naga items i've owned over the years.
A Senefelder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2012, 12:25 PM   #4
Indianajones
Member
 
Indianajones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 180
Default

My suggestion would be; loose the monkeyskull (which is certainly added later to make the 'nukky old dusty sword' a bit more saleable).
The shape of the sword is a visayan type (Panay/Negros isld), though the scabbard and handle do tend me to believe its more from the mainland; Bicolregion or more south. As they are bit more unusual and different shaped than most I've seen.
Nice good old piece anyway. Like that curve-ending of the scabbard. All honest (except the skull); to my humble opinion quite an oldy; 1890- 1920's

Hope it helps. Greets

b.t.w that "doorknob" below the protuding wood band on the scabbard would once have been connected by means of a wood 'bridge' (hence the splinter off the band) under which a textile band would slip to wear the sword on the hips.
Indianajones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2012, 07:01 AM   #5
Robert
EAAF Staff
 
Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
Default

Hello Wouter, And thank you very much for your reply and thoughts on this bolo. I will probably remove the skull from the scabbard in the next few days as it seems to be the one thing that everyone is in agreement on. It will more than likely look better sitting on a shelf by itself than attached to the scabbard anyway. I am still hoping that others will share their ideas on this item as well. Again, my thanks to you for your help.


Regards,
Robert
Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2012, 10:31 AM   #6
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,781
Default

Hello Robert,

I still remember the original ebay auction and the first thread. I don't think that the seller attached the skull to the scabbard and the binding look old and worn so it is maybe from the original owner. I personally wouln'd remove the skull. Have a look under the binding if you can see patina under the binding. When not is the skull already long with the scabbard.

Regards,

Detlef
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2012, 12:53 PM   #7
Indianajones
Member
 
Indianajones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 180
Default

Robert, yes would also like to see someone else (knowledgable) to confirm it is from Bicol/south Luzon or another region.
I do believe it is a rare piece as it(IF from there) was populated not by much folk. Also the shape reminds me more of pirate pieces. And this is not romanticising as there was a body of piratefolk, I believed called 'Malolos', swarming around the islands originating from South Luzon.

"Someone" has attached the skull and the other threads around the scabbard to hold the two halfs together. Originally the two parts of the scabbard would have been hold together by some more (narrow)woven rattan bands. When you take a better look at your scabbard you will see the lighter strokes where the rattan bands would have been; I have gently marked the strokes with red dots along for indication -V-.
Attached Images
 

Last edited by Indianajones; 13th October 2012 at 01:05 PM.
Indianajones is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.