![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
This is an example of an Parang Niabor used by the Sea dayaks.
Ben |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
Nice one. bit older than mine too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Poole England
Posts: 441
|
![]()
Am I correct in thinking that these are very very rare ?
I have been collecting for over 40 years and never seen one let alone owned one. Regards Roy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]() Quote:
Yes correct they very rare I had 3 but this one was the best so I did get it back this one could be easy from the 1700 s Ben |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,222
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,324
|
![]()
Parang Niabors indeed are rare to find, also because they are very old, and a charactaristic sword in use, when the langgai tinggai and jimpul were even called recent.
Even in museum collections they hardly occur, only from very early collected collections. But also in these museum collections they never show up in large numbers. :-) Kind regards, Maurice |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Hello Wayne,
Quote:
![]() Your's is not a parang niabor though. Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
Langgai Tinggang then?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]() Quote:
http://old.blades.free.fr/swords/day...ayak_intro.htm Ben |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
yup, that's where i got the name from....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,252
|
![]()
Hello Wayne,
Quote:
Assuming that your blade's cross-section isn't convex/concave, it possibly is supposed to represent a langgai tinggang... Regards, Kai Last edited by kai; 26th February 2018 at 08:49 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]() Quote:
Not correct the langgai tinggai Has an very different krowit. It is an cross we see this a lot with the newer type s Ben |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|