![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Colleagues,
I am thinking about writing an article on the genesis of a particular weapon. Do you know any journals dedicated to the history of weapons ( perhaps more specifically, oriental ones)? I know of Gladius( but it is in Spanish) and Arms and Armour ( Royal Armories). Any more? Many thanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]()
Hi
Gladius is Spanish, but you can publish in English and French also. Then for other journals it depends of your topic... Best, Kubur |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,614
|
![]()
Man at Arms maybe, though they are mostly publishing articles on American and European antique weapons. There really is not a magazine that is focused on Eastern arms and armor.
Teodor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Hi Ariel,
South Asian Studies in London. I dont, however, know how much they have on weapons, so you will have to visit a library to find out. In 2009 I had an article published there 'Royal Katars of Bundi', so they must, now and again, have articles on weapons. Jens |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,497
|
![]() Quote:
I opted to create articles in Wikipedia on a few subjects which I found were not adequately represented online. There are drawbacks to this method as well but I have found that many more people have an oppertunity to read what I have to share with this method due to the huge internet presence of Wikipedia. Here are a couple of examples. Kusari (Japanese mail armor). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kusari_...e_mail_armour) Kura (saddle). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kura_(saddle) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 413
|
![]()
I agree with the Wikipedia idea. Although I have not authored any new articles, I have edited and added to multiple others that were in not so great shape. I think this is good community service precisely because Wikipedia has such a large audience, and it is incumbent on those with the knowledge to improve this public resource. Furthermore, the state of organization of the ethnographic edged weapons material on Wikipedia is poor and could use some high level editing. Even the simple creation of "stub" articles for expansion by others would be beneficial. I know several of you, perhaps many, who have the skill to do this well. I urge everyone on this forum to become familiar with authoring and editing Wikipedia. It is easy and rewarding!
Best, Dave A. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,497
|
![]() Quote:
I have personally gone through all of the Japanese armor and weapons related Wikipedia articles, I have added images, text and references as well as creating several new articles. I have also created many of the Japanese arms and Indo-Persian arms and armor categories on Wikimedia Commons. Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons is the best, least expensive and easiest way to reach people that I know of and at the same time they are way under utilized. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
For dissemination of information (both accurate and inaccurate) Wikipedia is a wonderful vehicle.
However, if one aspires to scholarly writing, publishing in a peer-reviewed journal is preferred. If the author can retain publishing rights, it can be reposted in the public domain, or otherwise referenced on the internet... (I, incidentally, have no such aspirations or ability. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Yes Andrew, this is a very good answer.
If you publish in a scholary journal/magazine it will be mentioned in te bibliography when the article is used - but very few writing for these journals will quote from Wikipedia - which you, no doubt, already know. As an achademic who has no doubt published a lot of artichels, I wonder why you ask this question? Jens |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,497
|
![]() Quote:
"Scholary journal/magazine" etc may not quote from Wikpedia but on the other hand the average person will never read that "scholary journal/magazine" so your information will just be available to a handful of acedamics, this is satisfactory to some people but if you actually want people to read and learn from what you have researched then sometimes compromises are needed. Some subjects can not really be peer reviewed, if no acedemic has any real knowledge of a certain subject and it has not been researched and published already what will they base their review on. Here is an example, my Wikipedia article on Japanese karuta armor is the only one like it in the world, no book or article explains it better and it is available for anyone to see and use. It provides all the basic information, references and images needed to understand what karuta armor is. If this was published in a "Scholary journal/magazine" no one would see it except a handful of uninterested academics. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karuta_(armour) For the more scholary types academia.edu may be of interest. https://www.academia.edu/about |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|