|
16th September 2008, 01:52 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Gabriel Foothills, Southern California
Posts: 94
|
Sword I.D. Help Needed
Hello,
I picked up this sword in a collection recently, and was wondering if anyone in the forum could help me with it's origin. The overall length is 39 1/4" , with the blade accounting for 31 3/4" of the length. I can't find any marking on the piece at all. The leather covering over the wooden grip has seen better days. I collect Pacific Island weapons, so this is a little out of my range of collecting. Thank you, Joe |
16th September 2008, 02:24 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 237
|
That is interesting.
The hilt has sort of an "alive" look. I'd bet that it is decorative, 19th c. The blade though looks like it might be authentic. Sort of hard to tell without handling it. |
18th September 2008, 03:19 AM | #3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,945
|
I'm with Ed on this, it does have the look of 19th century interpretation of a rapier, using what appears to be a 19th century sabre blade. An attractive piece that might well be theatrical.
Thanks for posting it Joe, looks like it probably handles pretty well! Best regards, Jim |
18th September 2008, 03:45 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 237
|
and another dratted "Urn" pommel
|
18th September 2008, 11:39 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 48
|
Hi Folks,
Looks like a C19th stage sword to me. The grip, pommel and quite possibly hilt appear to be C19th, and possibly with a cut down or ex-military blade. A bit difficult to be more specific or sure without handling and close examination. All the best, Macdonald |
18th September 2008, 01:06 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Madrid / Barcelona
Posts: 256
|
I agree, it looks like a mismatch of original, made up, and contemporary parts, trying to reproduce a 16tt-17th c. düssage - type weapon. As Paul said, pommel looks, at the best, later, the shell is made on the spot, the cross-block (a swordsmith friend of mine likes to call it "the spider", not a bad name) may be original... or not, and the blade could indeed easily be a 19th c. recycled military blade. It definitely would need a hands-on inspection to work out the details, but, as a whole, I agree that it seems a 19th. c product.
|
28th September 2008, 04:59 PM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
Hi Ed,
Saw today a few urn-pommels, Wither's "World Swords": German c.1600 Two handed sword. German Two-handed Stoc. C. 1500, both in p. 18. German Executioner Sword c. 1680 p. 14. and a squared sided version on p. 16, set on a German Bastard Sword c. 1600. In Bull's "An Historical Guide to Arms and Armor" there's another couple of these pesky beasties on p. 104 set in two German Two-handers of C. 1580. I mean, there aren't two exactly alike, but the design and form is there, quite apparent. Best Manolo Quote:
|
|
|
|