Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 19th June 2007, 07:57 PM   #1
eli
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon US
Posts: 21
Default The Purpose of Keris Panjang

Hi I am a long time viewer but only second or third time thread starter.
I asked these questions on Keris Panjang a while ago but because I'm still interested I am starting a new thread about it to see if there's any fresh information on the subject.

Questions below-


I have always wondered on the role Keris Panjang plays in Indonesian society. I have come to understand that it is meant for judges, kings or people who have the right to execute somebody. But is its role first and foremost as a weapon of execution or as a symbol of power? Does anybody know when the first keris Panjang started showing up? Does anybody know why Keris panjang seem to be mainly made in Sumatra and Malaysia and what is its role in these societies? Thanks for any help in advance!-Eli
eli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2007, 09:06 AM   #2
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
Default

Quote:
is its role first and foremost as a weapon of execution or as a symbol of power?
From what I understand, it's mainly a sign of power and status - you don't need an extra long blade for this way of execution. If I understand correctly, regular-sized Keris Jawa were used on Java for this purpose. Can our experts in things Jawa verify this, please?

Another hypothesis I came across was that the long blade evolved in response to the European rapiers when Portugese/etc. ships arrived at the scene...

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2007, 09:25 AM   #3
eli
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon US
Posts: 21
Default

From my knowledge the therory of combating rapiers has been but to rest do to the short tang on a keris which would make it easy to break during a fight. And many have also commented on the overall lack of efficency it would have compared to a rapier. Finally, if we look at where we see keris Panjang( often with royality or high ranking offcials) it just doesnt add up for me.
eli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2007, 12:24 PM   #4
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
Default

Hello Eli,

Quote:
From my knowledge the therory of combating rapiers has been but to rest do to the short tang on a keris which would make it easy to break during a fight.
This assumption usually seems to be made by people not well versed in the use of keris as a weapon. Sure, having to face someone skilled with a rapier is a scary thought. Having to face a skilled Pesilat is not a nice thought either...

Quote:
And many have also commented on the overall lack of efficency it would have compared to a rapier.
I don't think that we should imagine a SEA warrior switching to European style fencing. While the old rapiers were quite sturdy, they are fairly specialized weapons as are keris; a little bit of extra reach might come in handy...

Quote:
Finally, if we look at where we see keris Panjang( often with royality or high ranking offcials) it just doesnt add up for me.
Well, the rank of file were usually armed with swords of the pedang or klewang type.

This hypothesis is not my favorite, too - yet it needs to be discussed seriously and not just dismissed out of hand.

Another line of thought could be that the gentry wanted to display that they had blades resembling rapiers even if they were not meant to be used against Europeans, at least not in a duel-like situation. So they could be mainly status blades and still owing their development to early contacts with Europeans.

BTW, what are the oldest keris panjang known? Any pics?

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2007, 04:10 PM   #5
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kai
Another line of thought could be that the gentry wanted to display that they had blades resembling rapiers even if they were not meant to be used against Europeans, at least not in a duel-like situation. So they could be mainly status blades and still owing their development to early contacts with Europeans.
This would be more my line of thought. A keris panjang is not at all the same type of weapon as a rapier. This doesn't mean that handled by the right hand that it could not be an effective weapon. But it would seem to me that if a weapon were to be made in matial response to a European rapier that length would be just one of the considerations. As a status response however, just being longer might be enough.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2007, 07:15 PM   #6
eli
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon US
Posts: 21
Default

Thank you Kai for explaining the rapier Idea better.
Another thought to think about is its brother forms Anak Along and Bahari, did these forms preceed the Panjang or come after it?
eli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2007, 09:54 PM   #7
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
Default

Hello David,

Quote:
But it would seem to me that if a weapon were to be made in matial response to a European rapier that length would be just one of the considerations.
Which other aspects are you thinking of?

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.