|
8th August 2012, 03:15 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3
|
keris & handle for comments
Hello
I am new in this forum. I joined because I recently inherited a number of keris and keris related pieces about which I want to know more. I would be much obliged for any comments. I am also an avid collector of Javanese wayang golek. If anybody shares this interest please let me know. |
9th August 2012, 12:18 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
|
Hello Eric,
Welcome to our forum! The bone hilt seems to be from Bali; not that old (post-WW2) and was never fitted on a keris. The keris as well as its fittings seem to be from Madura. The hilt does look village-made and post-WW2 to me; I'd guess that the blade is older but it's certainly wise to be cautious in the absence of safe indicators of age as suggested by Alan: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showpo...7&postcount=66 Regards, Kai |
9th August 2012, 01:07 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,247
|
Regarding the blade, that is what Alan probably would call a ghost of a blade: there is merely a slorok left of it, with residual traces of pamor material.
Looking at how the blumbangan is made it was not so bad. The following is of course naive, yet I always imagined, a Pusaka of common village people could look somehow like this (see also the last pictures in van Duurens publication of Gronemans book). Last edited by Gustav; 9th August 2012 at 01:20 AM. |
12th August 2012, 04:03 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3
|
Thanks to Kai and Gustav for the comments. Can anybody point me to a good web address for keris terminology?
|
12th August 2012, 06:59 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 169
|
|
12th August 2012, 08:10 PM | #6 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,120
|
Quote:
|
|
12th August 2012, 11:21 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,889
|
What David has said about terminology is correct:- the names used for keris and keris related items vary from place to place, not only from country to country, island to island, town to town, but from one side of the street to the other, and from one person to another, depending upon hierarchical position in the particular societal group.
However, the centre of keris culture is the Jawa/Bali nexus, and the terminology used in Central Jawa has increasingly dominated the terminology used in other places, very probably because the culture of the keris in Jawa never really died during the WWII period, and its full resurgence in the period after WWII occurred earlier than in other places. The keris as we know it now originated in Jawa, from Jawa it went to Bali where it has preserved its cultural identity until today. It also spread to other parts of S.E.Asia, where its identity tends to reflect the way in which it may have entered the particular society.In its place of origin, Jawa, it has changed its nature in accordance with sociological conditions, thus what we now see in Jawa is not what the keris was in Jawa prior to the Islamisation of Jawa. The original nature of the keris is better reflected in its position in Balinese society. What I have written here is more than you asked for Eric, but in my opinion a small amount of basic knowledge is required before any attempts at an increase in knowledge can have any use or meaning. Here are links to two pages which will provide you with a basic source upon which you can begin to build an understanding of the keris. This link will take you to a glossary:- http://www.kerisattosanaji.com/kerisglossary.html This link will take you to a page that contains a reading list and a few other useful links:- http://www.kerisattosanaji.com/kerisinformation.html |
|
|