Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 19th February 2022, 03:25 PM   #1
Royston
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Poole England
Posts: 443
Default Indonesian, English or the other way around?

I have had this Indonesian knife for a long time and often wondered about the origin of the hilt.
Found this Bowie on the net and I think the question of origin is answered.
What do you think? Copied or " borrowed "
Roy
Attached Images
      
Royston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2022, 03:31 PM   #2
Royston
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Poole England
Posts: 443
Default

The title should say "way" not " war"
Royston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2022, 04:44 PM   #3
Mel H
Member
 
Mel H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: North East England.
Posts: 107
Default

I would tend to go for the Borrowed. The Sheffield 'Cutlery' Rococo, pistol handled Bowies were popular in the US during the 19th C. Some were silver and some plated. Similar handles are seen on antique meat carving cutlery sets.
Mel H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2022, 05:25 PM   #4
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,763
Default

Hello Roy,

The knife itself is a peurawot from Aceh I guess, see here: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...highlight=aceh. English bread handles sometimes seen on knives from mainland SEA, it's the first time I saw an English handle with an Indonesian blade.

Regards,
Detlef
Attached Images
  
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2022, 08:22 PM   #5
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
Post

Hello Detlef & Mel,

I agree that the hilt is most certainly borrowed. The British had a strong presence, especially on Sumatra, and kept trading even after the Dutch took over again (but still had not taken over all of Sumatra until into the 20th century).

However, this is not from greater Aceh and, thus, not a peurawot. Typical peurawot have a classic blade shape while there are also some examples exhibiting deviating blade shapes like the one shown by Detlef.

This scabbard is different despite some similarities in carving at the mouth. Details are not Aceh style though.

This blade is a rawit. If this ensemble got not assembled by one of the Batak groups, the blade might as well had travelled to one of the coastal communities and trading ports and possibly got adapted locally. Just brainstorming though.

Closeups of the carving might help to place it (please include both sides and a top view, Roy).

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2022, 12:25 AM   #6
Mel H
Member
 
Mel H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: North East England.
Posts: 107
Default

Is it possible that the style of the carving on the scabbard is influenced by the swirling decoration on the pommel? There does seem to be some resemblance. As Kai remarks, British goods were everywhere in the 19th C.
Mel H is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.