![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,057
|
![]()
acquired a very nice grete war sword 1250-1300 for under the Christmas tree.
this sword is published by Ewart Oakeshott in records of the medieval sword. XIIIa-12 page 105. however the blade length mentioned is not correct it is 10cm larger, it is a true two hand sword (TTL length is 124cm.) there are 2 marks filled with latten ,two on both sides, can somebody provide some more info about these marks? merry X-mas and a Happy 2010. Last edited by cornelistromp; 21st December 2009 at 08:00 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,057
|
![]()
christies 1983 lot 27
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,896
|
![]()
Fantastic sword Cornelis!!!
As you know I've always been fascinated by marks, and I'm really glad that you have shared these. Naturally these 'latten' (filled brass) inlays are seen in good number on the early Germanic blades and well into the period you mention. In "The Wallace Collection" (486a; p.251; p.688) a hand and a half sword is shown and described as with 16th century hilt....the blade earlier. The marking on the blade is of an inverted heart with cross mounted at the tip of the heart...the cross with open disc at center. This is almost a composite of these two markings you show here. The strange geometric figure under the cross seems a crudely fashioned heart type shape, using straight lines rather than the typical heart shape. It seems that these cross oriented inlays may have been associated with these earlier times when forging blades and warring materials were one of the functions of the bishopry. Markings such as these with religiously oriented talismanic properties were believed to imbue the blades and thereby the warrior with the power needed to succeed in battle. These early uses of the cross and orb representing these type symbolisms are seen later in the well established 'merchants marks' in format using the mark of 4 atop the chosen symbol or 'logo'/initials etc. While certainly certain makers in later times had marks of thier own, these seem more generally applied with perhaps certain abbeys favoring one or the other. One side of the blade typically had one symbolic mark while the other was often of different marking. Often the crozier symbol occurred opposite markings of this type. I'm sure those here with more access to plates of markings or examples of other medieval period swords will be able to add more concise comparisons, but these are just notes on the concept of the marks from my opinions. All best regards, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 910
|
![]()
Very, very nice.
I am aware of some other measurement discrepancies in Records however this is the most extreme to my recollection. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,057
|
![]()
Hello Jim,
thank you very much for your expert comments ![]() thanks for the link to Wallace A486, I also found a similar in the estruch collection. Iam still not sure if this mark is a splitted cross (like missaglias) or a early ORB representing a church or a crossed heart ![]() The cross mark with a square at the center are found on 9th and 10thC Viking swords in Finland. So my search did not make any sense at all ![]() Best regards from Holland |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,057
|
![]()
Hi Jim,
Hi Lee, Concerning the dimensions this is what Ewart Oakeshott says in the publication "the Grant espee d'allemagne" quote there is something I have neglected to do, as well as something else which would be very useful,indeed very wise, to include in my writings. The omission is that I have never given any attention to the dimensions of the swords I write about. this may seem absurd, but I think it is because I have been accustomed to handling medieval swords for nearly 70 years-literally from the age of 4. So there is tendence, being so familiar with the size and "heft" of them, to take it for granted that this is common knowledge, not something rare and esoteric that I am privileged to share in. unquote Ewart Oakenshott must have liked the sword; I found two more articles in which my new sword is discussed by him ![]() Because he was so familiar with medieval sword I think he failed to take accurate measurements then. SIC SEMPER CONFERRUS/as best can be recalled. the articles are in his final book "sword in hand" a masterpiece I ordered at armor.com (recommended) Chapter 8 SPLENDID PRIDE AND COURAGE Chapter 10 THE GRANT ESPEE D'ALLEMAGNE best regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|