|
29th January 2008, 09:24 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,184
|
Mediterranean knife?
just picked this up on ebay, described as:
===========ebay item description========== Antique Victorian Egyptian / Islamic design dagger. The dagger dates between 1880-1920 and measures 25cm (10 inches) long. The handle is made of what looks to be pieces of either wood or horn (or both). The blade has some slight corrosion to it (see photos) but otherwise the dagger is in good condition for it's age. blade 6 in. ===================================== pommel end: Ebay item link looks more gaucho/spanish or 'mediterranean' to me. |
29th January 2008, 10:28 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
Nice one Kronckew! But well Egypt is still Meditearainian Bolster looks islamic to my eye.
Id say thats all horn rings on the handle. Blade looks wootzy? But perhaps just old rust tracks? close up picks when you get it would be good. Spiral |
29th January 2008, 11:47 PM | #3 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,226
|
Another possiblity - an old Syrian piece done for the Victorian market?
The horn layers on the hilt and the brass work look Syrian-Lebanese to me. |
30th January 2008, 02:37 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 493
|
Syrian for me also
Hi All,
I agree with Battara. I just looked at my two Majali Shams jambiyia and the butt caps on both (with the exposed tang) look very similar to kronckew's blade. Sincerely, RobT |
30th January 2008, 07:33 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,184
|
thanks, it does have the same overall shaped hilt as my little lebanese dagger:
i knew i'd seen that shaped hilt with a peened brass pommel plate somewhere. the last weapon i bought that was listed as 'egyptian' was really a very nice dha, so i've learned to be a bit sceptical of 'egyptian' |
30th January 2008, 07:55 PM | #6 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,226
|
This last one you posted is more recent. The other one is older perhaps by a century.
|
|
|