|
28th February 2017, 09:41 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,232
|
Interesting Sundang
I just acquired this sundang which I believe to be from 1900 to 1945, probably closer to 1900 ; what I found interesting was that the aring(forgive me if I have mislabeled this part), was filled with a metal that looks like silver.I have seen the blades of other weapons with metal inserts, but this is the first time in my limited experience that I have seen the guard of a sundang filled.
Any comments would be appreciated. |
1st March 2017, 01:08 AM | #2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,226
|
Nice example. Congratulations!
This is a Maguindanao kris that I would place a little after 1900. You may want to etch the blade to see if it is mono-steel or laminated. The copper top on the hilt may have been once covered by a thin sheet of gold to match the ferrule. |
1st March 2017, 01:22 AM | #3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,204
|
drac2K:
Nice Maguindanao kris. Like Battara, I would place this one later in the 20th C. for several reasons: the sharply pointed, spear tip to the blade; the absence of a separate gangya (an inscribed line has replaced where it would normally be separated); and the general appearance of the sword which looks in mint condition with very crisp incised decorations and pristine hilt. My guess would be closer to mid-20th C., although the scabbard may be a little older. Ian |
1st March 2017, 01:29 AM | #4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,226
|
Ian do you think this ganga is not separate? I thought it was. If not, then I would agree that it is mid-20c.
|
1st March 2017, 02:02 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,232
|
Thanks Gentlemen.I am pretty sure that the gangya is separate(maybe wishful thinking).I'll try to get better pictures.I agree that there once was a cap on the end of the pommel.
|
1st March 2017, 02:16 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,788
|
Would agree with Jose, turn of the centuries, early 20th century. I agree again, the gangya is seperate. Nice piece! Sadly you don't etch.
Regards, Detlef |
|
|