|
21st June 2020, 01:41 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 413
|
Another ancestor figure example for ID
This one I have not received yet. I'm fairly confident the hilt (at least) is Batak, but the name/style is not clear. The scabbard seems unusual and might not be original
Your thoughts? Dave A. |
21st June 2020, 02:10 AM | #2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,221
|
Oh I'd say pretty Batak.
|
21st June 2020, 10:03 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,781
|
Yes, it's Batak style but I doubt that this knife has any serious age, I would say it's worked to cheat, sorry!
Regards, Detlef |
21st June 2020, 11:28 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 413
|
Clues
Thank you Detlef,
I was an inexpensive bet. I would be grateful to learn the most important clues that led to your conclusion. Dave A. |
22nd June 2020, 01:28 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,781
|
Hello Dave,
The blade has the wrong form, the scabbard is wrong, the patination somewhat odd. The handle look good, nice carved. Sure I only can be when handling the piece but I am very skeptical. Regards, Detlef |
9th July 2020, 03:20 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 413
|
Returned
I received the item and the poor qualities were immediately clear. The seller was quite miffed by my objections but eventually agreed to a full refund on the condition that I never do business with them again.
Thank you all for your early opinions. Dave A. |
|
|