![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 495
|
![]()
Curiosity got the better of me with this one. I can't quite make out some facets of how this hilt was put together but I am somehow thinking it is of around 1700, or perhaps a little earlier. Then again, I may be way, way off. Either I did well, or paid a premium for a modernistic take on this form. A military smallsword, or ?????
Cheers GC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,192
|
![]()
I am not sure but at least one mark is very similar to marks used by Spanish sword cuttlers of Toledo.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 495
|
![]()
Thank you. I am pretty sure the other mark references the Kingdom of Castile. I am having a hard time putting the hilt in the 16th century though. The acute point to the blade makes for it being a serious item, vs a decorator.
Cheers GC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 22
|
![]()
Your hilt, handle, pommel and guard appear to be a casting rather than individual components from what I can see in the photos. What construction detail were you trying to figure out?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 495
|
![]()
I don't believe the ferrules are cast to the grip, nor the plates and annelets part of the grip casting, with the pommel and peen blocks separate as well.
At any rate, such castings coming in by the mid 17th century. I don't have a "twin" to compare it to, hence my being unconvinced of just about anything right now. Once in hand, I can be more sure of how many pieces comprise the hilt. Cheers GC Last edited by Hotspur; 14th October 2019 at 05:40 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Glen, you know i am not a connoisseur at all but, i dare say that, the emblem for Castile in its single form dates far back in time, later replaced by the 'composite' Leon y Castela coat of arms, more consonant in period with what should appear in this sword. Also i doubt that the Toledo smith mark suggested by Udo is the one in your blade.
So, without questioning the authenticity of your sword, i seem to question the originality of its marks ... unless they were a personalized feature. But then again, don't pay much notice to my mumbo jumbo. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 237
|
![]()
Sent some pictures off to a dealer pal of mine.
Looks like a decorator to me. Blade and application of the markings seem odd. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 495
|
![]() Quote:
Respectfully who is the dealer? Cheers GC |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,869
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 495
|
![]()
Point taken guys but Ed's comment could have been conveyed privately as well. I was simply curious as to whom he refers. It is a pretty small world. I'm not here for the politics.
That opinion aside, here are some resized images. All fittings are ferrous and imo, steel or iron. The plates do appear cast but I believe I may have mentioned cast steel was coming into vogue by the mid 17th century. I do not think the plates were cast together with the body of the roped guard but joined hot. I have done my best to show sections that were assembled. I have scrubbed a section of the blade and will be taking off the grunge/varnish, whatever that top coat is. You can somewhat see it had been sharp and then somewhat bated at some point. If I return with after photos, that will reinforce my take on a shortened or re-purposed blade. I could guess it might have been from an older broken estoc or rapier but that is just speculation. As this venue is not an exclusive inquiry and presentation of this piece, I can hope that if I happen to cross post a name or few that some can understand it is, collectively, a pretty small world and we all should be able to discuss a given object. I'm done for now. Cheers GC Three more in the next post |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|