Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 26th June 2016, 03:31 PM   #1
Zauberflöte
Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 13
Default 16th century halberd; origin??

Dear all,

This appears to be a German halberd; can anyone share anything about the makermark?

Thank you.

F.
Attached Images
 
Zauberflöte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2016, 04:07 PM   #2
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Can you show us more of this nice halberd, F ?
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2016, 02:58 PM   #3
Ed
Member
 
Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 237
Default

Looks Swiss-ish, maybe 17th century?

If you look at the relative thickness of the contact point of the blade to the length of the blade, the closer they are to being the same, the older the piece.

Could you post a picture of the head?
Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2016, 07:19 PM   #4
Zauberflöte
Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 13
Default

These are the best for the moment (do not yet have the halberd in hand at the moment).

Hope these help.
Attached Images
  

Last edited by Zauberflöte; 27th June 2016 at 10:45 PM.
Zauberflöte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2016, 03:27 AM   #5
Ibrahiim al Balooshi
Member
 
Ibrahiim al Balooshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
Default

Have a look at http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...hlight=halberd where an identically stamped weapon is at #1.

Last edited by Ibrahiim al Balooshi; 28th June 2016 at 06:32 AM.
Ibrahiim al Balooshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2016, 10:50 AM   #6
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

But not the same, though

.
Attached Images
 
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2016, 01:45 PM   #7
stekemest
Member
 
stekemest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 182
Default

The style of the pictures looked so familiar to me.

...and indeed there are far better pictures.

http://www.hermann-historica.de/aukt...b=kat72_AW.txt
stekemest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2016, 04:14 AM   #8
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ibrahiim al Balooshi
Have a look at http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...hlight=halberd where an identically stamped weapon is at #1.

Brilliant Ibrahiim!!!
Following the links leads to the original source of this halberd, apparently one of a pair several months ago discussed on other forums. While not 'exact', it is compellingly like the mark of a Pankraz Taller, a blacksmith for the Styrian armory in Graz c. 1575-1612. The mark is the same 'X' in cartouche with two 'dots' (?)
It seems halberds had these stamped cartouches in the same location on rear blade 16th-into 17th.
While markings sources I checked revealed no others like this, nor mention of Taller (reference was "Euro Journal Heft" 1/2000 in article Katharina Ulbrich discussing blacksmiths in this armory). ....I did find another crossed lines mark with added lines geometrically configured. Also another cartouche with initials HW as shown in post here and another circular found elsewhere.These all on halberds late 16th.

In Wallace Coll. (Mann, 1962, A953, p. 452) is a similarly bladed halberd also with brass rosettes, but highly decorated, no markings, German and dated 1593 with motif to Archduke Ernst (1553-1595).
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2016, 12:59 PM   #9
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Allow me to show my surprise, Jim.
The differences between the marks of both examples are rather visible. While the one from the link has the unequivocal mark of Pankraz Taller, with its shape of a shield and X cross interior with dots, the mark of the one in discussion has the shape of a square and, instead of dots, has an extra line departing from the X cross center. I guess such details could not be result of bad striking and constitute differences that enable us to establish that the two marks belong to different smiths.
But then, i might be wrong and am ready to stand corrected.


.

Last edited by fernando; 29th June 2016 at 01:47 PM.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2016, 02:03 PM   #10
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default Speaking of bad striking ...

This is how Craig Johnson at MyArmoury concluded that the mark in my Styrian halberd was that of Pankraz Taller, after i had a comment from Reinhart Dittrich from Landeszeughaus Graz suggesting (only suggesting) so.
Needless to say that, before Craig's excelent demonstration, i had strong doubts such assumption.

.
Attached Images
   
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2016, 06:16 PM   #11
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fernando
Allow me to show my surprise, Jim.
The differences between the marks of both examples are rather visible. While the one from the link has the unequivocal mark of Pankraz Taller, with its shape of a shield and X cross interior with dots, the mark of the one in discussion has the shape of a square and, instead of dots, has an extra line departing from the X cross center. I guess such details could not be result of bad striking and constitute differences that enable us to establish that the two marks belong to different smiths.
But then, i might be wrong and am ready to stand corrected.


.
Not at all Fernando, actually you are entirely correct, the marks while 'similar' are different, however the gestalt and positioning of these marks are compellingly close in these cases.
I was unable to find marks of Taller in any of my resources on markings, and wondered if perhaps being a 'blacksmith' within the auspices of the armoury might have precluded the usual markings protocols associated with guilds etc in the broader scope of production.

Also, I was wondering if these variations in the 'X' inside either square or shield type cartouche might reflect changes or possibly subtle indicators having to do with production record keeping or the like. It seems that often markings of the same 'type' occur in odd or different configurations or combinations, such as seen with 'sickle marks' and others like the familiar 'kings heads'.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.