![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 187
|
![]()
Hi guys, I have been reading a book about the Napoleonic wars, and it contained a pic of Davout with his sword. I am curious as to what sword a Marshal of France might carry. Can anyone I D the sword ? I hope that there is sufficient detail. Also a pic of the dustjacket, this type of action must have been terrifying for the participants, unless the excitement blotted out the fear.
Regards to all, Brian |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PR, USA
Posts: 679
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,896
|
![]()
Fascinating topic, and great post Brian! Why the particular interest in Davout? It would be interesting to know more on this Marshal, and indeed on the type of swords he might have used.
I think Manuel has posted well placed comments and illustrations in the type sabres common to high ranking officers in this period. After campaigns in Egypt, many of the French, and for that matter British, officers sought to have sabres of the type seen in use by the Mamluk warriors. The sabre itself was of course well established with light cavalry by this period, and these neoclassic style motifs were common, as well as certain elements of the Islamic sabres. The elliptical shaped langets are characteristically French. I think that describing the surreal events in combat and warfare typically elude the limitations of most vocabularies, and the word fear falls incredibly out of dimension. I think that those individuals involved in such events as these battles would likely experience every emotion, and incomprehensible image psychologically possible to the human mind. One of the best books I have found with great perspective is "The Face of Battle" by the late John Keegan, whose description of such perceptions in combat at Waterloo and others is remarkable. All best regards, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 187
|
![]()
Hi Jim, the reason I used Davout as subject was that his was the only pic in the book that showed a sword in reasonable detail!
Here are some questions: 1.Did cavalry at that time wear any sort of armour? Helmets I suppose, maybe cuirasses? 2.Did cavalry at that time carry muskets/rifles/pistols as well as swords? Or were they armed with swords only? Lances? 3.Infantry were certainly armed with muskets/rifles and bayonets, but did they carry swords as well or did only infantry officers carry swords? 4.If cavalry wore armour, was this all cavalry or only some units? 5.If cavalry carried rifles/muskets, were these carried slung over the shoulders or perhaps in a scabbard attached to the saddle? 6.Were pistols carried as a matter of course by all combatants or only officers? 7.Please define "dragoon".....is this a branch of cavalry? Best regards, Brian |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,896
|
![]() Quote:
Hi Brian, That makes sense, and you have really presented some well placed questions, which I am assuming would be directed to Napoleonic forces of France. Although I do not consider myself much of a military historian, I will try to express what I understand to be the answers to some of these. The heavy cavalry were actually termed cuirassiers, and did wear armoured breast and backplates, as well as helmets. Cavalry typically had short carbines, pistols in buckets on the saddles and swords. Only the units of light cavalry designated as lancers had the lance, with sometimes pistols but always the sabre for the melee. Typically infantry had muskets with bayonets, but did not carry swords. I believe in the case of French, they did carry a short sword in many cases. Only the cuirassiers wore armour, they were considered heavy cavalry, where light cavalry was clearly intended less for shock action and more for fast moving reconaissance, attack and pursuit. I believe the short carbines may have had a bucket, but it seems many had a sling . The dragoon was a 17th-18th century type of heavy cavalry that was essentially a sort of mounted infantry, who often fought in foot as well as horseback. The term remained with regiments who became heavy cavalry intended for shock action in attack, much like armored divisions in modern warfare. Pistols were not as I understand standard issue to other ranks during this period, but officers of course typically were more likely to have them. Units considered more elite, such as lancers and cuirassiers were more likely to have a wider complement of pistols among the ranks. As I note, Im not a military historian, but these are the impressions I have from research and discussions past, and from recollection. Hopefully those better versed in Napoleonic history and orders of battle will add and correct as required, fascinating and most colorful period of history! All best regards, Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 187
|
![]()
Hi Jim, thanks for the informative reply. Since the Napoleonic wars covered the period 1895 (?) to about 1815, and cavalry wore armour, and since the American War of Independence was much earlier, one wonders if cavalry was used in the W of I and was armour used? Were lances used?
My knowledge of the W of I and the Civil War is largely based on films which may or may not be factual, but I can't recall ever seeing scenes of cavalry battles. regards, Brian |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|