|
29th May 2005, 05:17 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
collection of the highest quality
attached are an outstanding collection, and belonged to the first duke of wellington. note, the two 'europeanised' hilts that just beg discussion.
|
29th May 2005, 06:02 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
Thanks for showing, the pieces are very nice - I wonder what the blades were like?
Jens |
29th May 2005, 06:06 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
hi jens,
no way of knowing unfortunately, but the last sword has a long straight blade of european manafacture. not 100% sure, but seem to remember being disappointed when i saw a pic (unsheathed) in a book on the duke. i had hoped it was indian and of the same quality as the hilt. |
9th June 2005, 04:44 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Land below the wind
Posts: 135
|
What's the name of the first Duke of Wellington? Only Duke of W I know of is the one that defeated Napolean. Interesting to note the rather nice 13 luk Naga Sasra keris.
|
9th June 2005, 05:34 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
Brian, you and Jens tempt me terribly!
I'm normally a silver and ivory guy, but Indian gold-work is simply stunning. Thank you for sharing these. |
9th June 2005, 05:40 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
I assume the sword on the right is one of the Europeanized handles? Very interesting. It looks almost contemporary in it's precision. Can you describe the blade. The sword on the right (pulowar?) looks to have a watered blade? |
9th June 2005, 01:47 PM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, Texas USA
Posts: 257
|
Quote:
And obviously someone in a unique position to acquire an unprecedented collection |
|
9th June 2005, 03:15 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
Andrew, you will always be welcome in the exquisite circle of collectors of Indian white arms, just let us know.
It is a pity that the early collectors of Indian weapons, did not take a bigger interest in the history of the weapons, and especially in the weapons strange to the countries from where the collectors came. Berkley, very well researched, and very informative. |
|
|