![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3
|
![]()
I recently bought this shashka. The blade certainly looks to have all the hallmarks of a shashka, but I'll have to wait until I actually receive it to inspect the blade.
The stag horn handle is my main concern; I've never seen a shashka with a handle like that before. The auction house claimed it was made in the 18th century, but it looks far newer than that. Possibly a 20th century example made for tourists? Cheers ![]() Last edited by Robert; 16th March 2016 at 05:15 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,896
|
![]()
I must confess I would not think of a 'shashka' as having a stag horn hilt, but remembering that shashka, like many other terms with sword types, is mostly a regional designation but typically referring to the cleft hilt, guardless sabres of the Caucusus.
With stag horn hilts, I am inclined to think of the couteau de chasse/ hirshfanger/ hunting sword phenomenon of 17th-19th c Europe (actually of course carried into more modern arms as well). These were typically hangers either open or sometimes knuckleguarded hilts with shorter sabre blades. This seems a full size sabre simply with this unique style hilt. The blade appears of German make latter 18th c. The 'hunting' situation by then had become very much a European 'event' of the gentry and nobility probably best likened to golf in todays corporate and political hierarchy. Fashion was an utmost concern and swords were an accoutrement of style as much as practicality (often more the former). In European swords of the military auxiliary units, such as pandours of late 18th into early 19th they typically wore rather exotic uniforms as well as using weapons in same manner. The yataghan was a popular form and many were essentially Europeanized and I have a sabre, quite longish but with deep belly recurved blade, and a stag horn grip with slight cleft. This sabre may fall into these European auxiliary cavalry categories, but I am inclined to think in terms of an actual combat weapon, more in a dress or parade type. Just thoughts on possibilities, very handsome sabre! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
The blade has unsharpened ricasso.
In the absense of personal examination, I would suggest 2 possibilities: industrial European blade or ( more likely, IMHO) Indian " tulwar" blade. The handle is improvised, definitely not of a Caucasian style. In summary: IMHO it is not a shashka. My verdict ( purely personal opinion): it is an assembled item of recent manufacture. Last edited by ariel; 16th March 2016 at 10:57 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
|
![]()
Alex, Please read and follow forum rules and upload your photos directly to the forum. Linking to a hosting sites is not an acceptable practice unless copyright requires the use of a link.
Best, Robert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,903
|
![]() Quote:
Moreover, the tapering/narrowing of the blade towards the tip is definitely not characteristic for a Shashka. If you are looking for a name, Saber would be the most appropriate. Yet, I find the stag horn hilt a blatant mismatch. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,896
|
![]()
Actually, this entire theme has been a red herring, prompted by this bizarre description of this sabre with stag horn grip being termed a 'shashka'.
This blade is probably as Ariel has noted, an Indian tulwar blade (if indeed with blunt ricasso) or otherwise as he also notes, a European (likely German) trade blade. The fullering seems comparable to many German sabre blades of late 18th, but the use of the staghorn is most atypical, and agree that it seems most innovative. Use of the 'shashka' term most creative ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3
|
![]()
Many thanks for the informative replies! And Robert, thanks for editing my post so it meets the image posting requirements.
I guess this is one of those caveat emptor cases. Luckily I didn't pay too much for it, and it actually handles fairly decently for whatever it is. Despite its light weight, it doesn't feel 'whippy' and feels like it could cut reasonably well. I've done some sleuthing around and it looks like this frankentulwar/sabre was auctioned a couple of years ago, except it wasn't sold as a shashka but as an "Old English sword blade, later mounted in stag horn handle". Looks like someone cleaned it up and tried to pass it off as a shashka to overeager folks like myself. ![]() Does the blunt ricasso lend credence to it being a tulwar blade rather than a trade blade? Were European trade blades sharpened all the way down to the hilt? The blade seems a bit too dainty for it to be a tulwar, and most tulwar examples I've seen tend to be quite a bit wider near the tip. Do you guys perhaps have pics of tulwars or sabres with a similar blade shape? Jim, I'm particularly interested in those 18th century German sabre blades you mentioned. Some stats: Weight: 600-625g (my scale isn't particularly accurate) Point of Balance: 20.3cm Blade Length: 83.7cm Total length: 98.6cm Centre of Percussion: (very roughly) 16cm from the tip Blade width at CoP: 3cm Width of spine Base: 7.01mm 1/4: 4.76mm 1/2: 3.72mm 3/4: 1.83 10cm from the tip: 0.95mm |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|