Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10th June 2011, 06:24 PM   #1
rickystl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,623
Default Spanish Carbine ID

Hello all. I purchased this from a local gun show last year. This is a really unusual - but interesting - gun. I can't seem to pin a date as to it's original manufacture. The stock and brass mounts are definitely Spanish. Note: The lock on this gun was originally a standard type flintlock (like the original French/English style). The original lock mortise was filled with a wooden plug and re-inleted to accept the now miquelet lock. The lock is a sporting style with engraving all over. So, not a military item. (Hammer, top jaw, and screw are a replacement from the Riffle Shoppe) So, it appears obvious that this gun was originally in military use, and later (due to a broken/missing flintlock) recommissioned for civilian use. The plug and re-inletting was done very professionally - and back in the period. I know the Spanish military originally adopted the miquelet lock, changed to the standard type flintlock in the 1750's (I think) and then back to the miquelet about 1790. This gun has all the features of a musket. But it is carbine length. There is no sign that the barrel and stock were shortened in the past. In fact, it even has a lug for a bayonet on the lower part of the muzzle. Anyone have any research material that might be able to identify this carbine - in it's original form? Any help appreciated. Thanks, Rick.
Attached Images
           
rickystl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2011, 10:04 PM   #2
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Hi Rick,
Nice piece.
It is amazing that the (present) lock is a regional work, as having being made in Coruña; this is a particular situation, as most locks (and guns) bear marks of more charismatic centers, like Madrid, Ripol and so.
The barrel appears to keep its maker's mark quite readable, which so often doesn't happen. Can you post a close up picture of it?
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2011, 10:25 PM   #3
rickystl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,623
Default

Hi Fernando. Thanks so much for the comment. At least I now know which City the lock was probably made in. Yes, I will take a close-up of the barrel marks (there are two) tomorrow. As well, there is more on the frizzen that I forgot to post. Thanks, Rick.
rickystl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2011, 04:30 PM   #4
rickystl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fernando
Hi Rick,
Nice piece.
It is amazing that the (present) lock is a regional work, as having being made in Coruña; this is a particular situation, as most locks (and guns) bear marks of more charismatic centers, like Madrid, Ripol and so.
The barrel appears to keep its maker's mark quite readable, which so often doesn't happen. Can you post a close up picture of it?
Hello Fernando. Here is some additional pics, including an additional mark on the lower part of the frizzen. Do you know what the R on the wrist inlay stands for? Ripol? Hope you can read the barrel mark? If not, I'll try to get even closer. Thanks, Rick.
Attached Images
      
rickystl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2011, 08:32 PM   #5
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

TREVIÑO in the frizzen. This could be either a name of a village or the name of the lockmaker. Given that there is already a place (Coruña) engraved in the upper part, we must infer that Treviño is the name of the lock maker, a Galego (Galitian) in/from Coruña.
I didn't find a barrel (gun) mark with similar lettering in James Lavin's fine work "A History of Firearms". Try to take a better picture; not necessarily larger, but a bit more accurate. We can try and decipher the name that is there, even if it is not from a famous smith.
The R is a bit rustic; i wouldn't go for "Ripol" or even "Royal". Probably is the owner last name initial, engraved at delivery.
Mind you, i am not a specialist; other members may show up and give you better opinions .
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2011, 10:54 PM   #6
rickystl
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO area.
Posts: 1,623
Default

Fernando: Thank you so very much for the information. I will try to get a clearer picture of the barrel mark. It is difficult due to the fact that rust was taking over the barrel when I first aquired it. Thanks, Rick.
rickystl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2011, 11:21 PM   #7
Fernando K
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 669
Default

Hola, Rick

1º - No es una arma militar. Las guarniciones, abrazaderas del cañón (barrel), la placa de la culata y el guardamonte son de forma curvilínea.
2º - La parte de la caja (stock) donde se encaja (inleting) la llave(lock) parece haber sido para una llave de miquelete (miquelet lock) perdida y reemplazada por la actual, particularmente por su forma redonda.
3º - No he podido descifrar el punzón del cañón (barrel).
4º - El "punto" (lug) para la bayoneta, si es original, puede haber sido para calzar una bayoneta de caza.
5º - El escudo (escutcheon) con la letra R, no denota Ripoll (y no Ripol) y tradicionalmente usada para las iniciales del dueño.
6º - Por todo esto, creo que es un fusil o una carabina de caza, capaz de encastar una bayoneta.
7º - Ramiro Larrañaga, en "Sintesis Histórica de la Armería Vasca" (pagina 243) trae:
Treviño, Calixto de . Placencia. 1800
Treviño,Diego de . Limador. Eibar, 1762.
Treviño, Fermín de . Placencia, 1800
Treviño, Fernando de . Cajero (stockmaker). 1762.

Fernando K (no de Kirchner).

Hi, Rick

1 - not a military weapon. Fittings, clamps the barrel (barrel), the butt plate and trigger guard are curvilinear.
2 - The part of the box (stock) which is embedded (inleting) key (lock) appears to have been for a key Miquelet (Miquelet lock) lost and replaced by the current, particularly by its round shape.
3 - I could not figure out the punch of the gun (barrel).
4 - The "point" (lug) to the bayonet, if original, may have been to fit a bayonet fighter.
5 - The shield (escutcheon) with the letter R denotes no Ripoll (not Ripol) and traditionally used for the owner's initials.
6 - For all that, I think it is a rifle or hunting rifle capable of mating with a bayonet.
7 - Ramiro Larranaga, in "An introduction to the Armory Vasca" (page 243) brings:
Treviño, Calixto. Placencia. 1800
Treviño, Diego de. Filer. Eibar, 1762.
Treviño, Fermin. Placencia, 1800
Treviño, Fernando de. Cashier (stockmaker). 1762.

Fernando K (not Kirchner).
Fernando K is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.