![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
A discussion on another thread, gave me the impression that there was some confusion as to what a Peshkabz was/is.
In P.Holsteins book Contribution A L’Etude des Armes Orientales, 1931. Vol. II, plate XX, the author shows a few types, both when it comes to different grips but also with different types of blades. From left to right: #94 Peshkabz, Afghan or Peshawer. #107 small Kard Indo-Afghan. #6 Peshkabz, Indo-Afghan, Lahore, Punjab. #25 Peshkabz, Indo-Afghan or maybe Afghan, Peshawer. #141 Peshkabz, Indo-Afghan, Lahore. #32 Peshkabz, Indo-Afghan, Punjab or maybe Afghan. #12 Peshkabz, Indo-Afghan, Bhawalpur, Sind. See Egerton, plate XIV, #717. On page 138 Egerton writes, “Presented by H.H. the Nawab of Bhawalpur.” #15 Peshkabz, Indo-Afghan, Delhi the Mongol period. #235 Peshkabz, Afghan. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Pesh Kabz, Choora, Karud.....
Any difference? I remember, couple of years ago Artzi posted a very clear and precise definition of each. Being foolish, I did not print it and now cannot even remember the source. Artzi, wherever you are, can you (re)enlighten us, please? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 210
|
![]()
Pesh Kabz, Choora, Karud.....
Any difference? You can add "khanjar" and "khanjarli" to that list. BTW, what do you call the example in the bottom of the photo (#197)? n2s |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
I'd guess both(especially Khanjarli) are totally different animals.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,167
|
![]()
Ariel:
Ask and it appears: http://www.vikingsword.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/001923.html Unfortunately, the pictures are no longer linked. Perhaps Lee may have copies in the archives somewhere and can restore the excellent pictures Arttzi had posted. That old thread was started by you, Ariel, and you made a prophetic comment about forgetting the thread and its information. ![]() Ian. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
![]()
i would think that no single opinion could yield an acceptable definition, as it would surely depend on whatever book, or number of books he had refered to. maybe people can post all the definitions from noteable authors and see if a medium can be reached. there were a number of 'glossaries', some dating back to the 19thC and taken from travels in india and earlier writings. maybe after this, we can iron out any conflicts and reach a 'vikingsword' agreed terminology, as apposed to a rawson, egerton or pant.
anyone want to start? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
"That old thread was started by you, Ariel, and you made a prophetic comment about forgetting the thread and its information.
Ian." Rather embarrassing.... ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Madrid / Barcelona
Posts: 256
|
![]()
In fact, maybe I can help...
____________________________ Oriental-Arms, EEWRS forum, 26/12/2003 Choora , Pesh-kabz, Karud and Khyber Sword Here are examples of the whole family: ![]() The major Characteristic of each are as follows: Khayber Sword : Rather a sword not a dagger. It ranges from 20 to 45 inches in length (The one shown above is 21 inch long, one of the shortest I have seen). Triangular blade with a T spine. Full tang with grip slabs and some times with long metal bolsters. It is very well distributed from North India to Central Asia, but mostly shown up (and properly so called) in Afghanistan. Karud Primarily a Mail Piercing dagger. 10 -18 inches long (The one shown above is 18 inches). Blade abruptly narrowing at its base, with a pronounced T spine and many times with edge reinforcement rib. Massive handle, one piece or two grips on a full tang. It is well distributed in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Persia and Central Asian Countries. They all show a similar blade and differs mostly in handle materials and scabbard decoration. The one shown above is from Afghanistan, early 19 C. Pesh-Kabz A development of the Karud, with a re-curving blade and slightly down curving handle, which perfect it to be the best mail piercing blade (my private opinion). Similar blade narrowing at its base, pronounced T spine but sometimes it reaches only half of the blade length as in this case. Reinforced edge and sometimes thickened tip. Two slabs grips. It is well distributed in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. The one shown above is Mogul Indian 18 C. Choora This is also a development of the Karud, but usually smaller, 10-12 inches long. Similar blade. It has a very typical handle with grips composed of two or three sectors of metal, ivory, horn or a combination of all, with the pommel tips extending down more than in its brothers. Its distribution is limited to the areas around the borders of todays Pakistan and Afghanistan. The one shown above is late 19 or early 20 C. It should be mentioned that later made such daggers are widely found in various antique arms fairs with a variety of grip materials ranging from wood to modern plastics. Here is a close-up of the handles: ![]() On purpose I selected all the items with Ivory grips. The grips material (as well as scabbard construction and decoration are the key for these items origin: Whole metal grips in India. Ivory in India, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Walrus in Persia and Central Asia, Rhino horn in Bukhara, Horn in India and Afghanistan etc. it should be however also mentioned that as with many other blades , also here one find in many occasions a combination of all the above: Khayber sword with Choora handles and the like. ------------------------------- I think that trying to find some kind of (hopefully reasonably well-founded) agreement regarding these definitions may be, at least, a good exercise in analysis and discussion of the different features of each object and their significance. Intrascendent as they may be to the original makers/users/namers of the actual items, definitions are definitely useful to us... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|