![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
In his book Tirri shows the attached 'tulwar'. These are very rare and were used by a man on horse to stab someone laying on the ground. The idea was that the very slim, but stiff blade, should be able to penetrate a mail shirt, or maybe even plates. Tirri writes that these hilts were introdiced under Aurengzeb.
The only other one I have seen was, many years ago, in The Army Museum(?) in Istanbul, but the hilt was, of course, different. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 9,896
|
![]()
The good thing about Tirri's book is that its a great collectors handbook, and shows examples of a wide spectrum of weapons that typically come up in sales etc. This is one of the anomalies in that book, and I cannot say I have ever seen another.
It does seem that in some limited degree there were rapier blades mounted in early European contact in Mahratta context with Hindu basket hilts, but whether they were for court wear or actual use is not clear. The estoc was a long sword made for thrusting alone and used in various European armies in medieval to renaissance periods. Its cross section was ribbed as seen on armor piercing katars etc. and these were usually mounted on the saddle under the horsemans leg, This is shown in Rembrandts "The Polish Rider", while the rider wears a sabre at the side as regularly known. The Ottoman's are known to have had such a thrusting sword which I believe was called a 'mec' and are illustrated in Yucel's book on Islamic swords. Indian swordsmanship is often hard to describe or relate to when they are adopting the weapon forms of other groups or cultures, but that this is a thrusting sword in any manner is clear. Intriguing example! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
In Germany they are called 'Panzer stecher' as far as I am informed, so they must have been knnown in Germany as well. They are, however, rare.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,857
|
![]()
Jens, I do believe this type of weapon would be exceptionally rare, by virtue of the fact that not many men have 20" wrists.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Yes, Tirri doesn't give dimensions but, looks like a very large and heavy weapon.
I wonder why he gives Aurangzeb reference only to the the hilt style and not to the whole sword ... providing we can call it a sword. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
![]() Quote:
yes "Panzerstecher (eng. armor piercer)" or (Estoc, Bohrschwert eng.: bore sword) is correct. The lower dull part of he blade is intended to be grabed with the free left hand to bring more power to the thrust with both hands. In Germany or generelly Europe many techniques were known with the Estoc in both hands to give a better lever or more momentum behind the thrust. Roland |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
If I remember correctly, the length of the 'blade' is about the same length as a firangi blade, maybe a bit longer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]() Quote:
Question: some Indian maces have tulwar handles but they are not called tulwar, right? Do you think that your weapon is a tulwar - a sword - or a spear? It looks like a spear to me... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Thank you Roland:-).
Tirri calls it a 'Trusting Tulwar'. Which I find is wrong, that is why I wrote 'tulwar', as I did, as I did not know what it was called in English - I only knew the German name. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Lead Moderator European Armoury
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
In Norman's page 22-23 we can read how Sir John Smithe deals with this weapon typology. «tocks very conveniently worne after the Hongarian and Turkie manner under their thighs which tocks are long narrow stiffe swords onlie for the thrust» Whether the hilt type varies among countries/cultures and blade differs in profile and cross section (almost a rod some times ?) is another business. So happens with their purpose to perforate mail or only bodies, i guess. The name Mec is apparently modern Turkish, pairing with European Panzerstecher or Hegyestor. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|