|
1st March 2012, 05:58 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,781
|
Rugi from Alor for comment
Hello,
this Rugi I bought in Indonesia last summer. It is 81 cm inside the sheath with a blade from 50,5 cm which is crudely worked. Blade was heavy corroded. What do you think? And have someone an estimated age for it? Regards, Detlef |
4th March 2012, 02:02 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,781
|
No one?
|
4th March 2012, 03:40 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 737
|
hello!!
Beatiful piece! I have one very similar yours but with a very tin blade (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...highlight=rugi ) . Your blade semms good, to use. The decoration is good to me too.What do you think about blade? is thick ? thanks in advance carlos Last edited by carlos; 4th March 2012 at 03:44 PM. Reason: Add a link |
4th March 2012, 04:18 PM | #4 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,781
|
Quote:
thank you very much for comment!! The blade of my one is also not very thick, only 4 mm. how thick is your one? And do you have cleaned the blade of your rugi? Someone told me that many blades of rugis are not so thick and locally made from coach springs which would date them (yours and mine) to the mid of last century. Regards, Detlef |
|
4th March 2012, 05:44 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
Hi Detlef,
Sorry but I don't think it is very old, based on the motifs etc. Michael |
4th March 2012, 06:25 PM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,781
|
Quote:
Hi Michael, my guess as well. Based upon the the thick smoke patina special at the sheath I would guess middle until second half last century. But it seems that it was used, for ceremonial purpose maybe? I know from a friend in Indonesia who coming from Alor that they still in use. He as well think that it is not very old. Regards, Detlef Last edited by Sajen; 4th March 2012 at 09:25 PM. |
|
4th March 2012, 08:35 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
Hi Sajen,
I do not like passing disparaging comments on items but IMHO, none of these swords presented are very old, 1980s at best. I believe these to all be part of a cottage industry seen still today. It seems every year in Bali, Borneo, Timor and Java there is a new type or a new region of interest to the people in the cottage industry to make up... Gavin |
4th March 2012, 08:58 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,781
|
Hi Gav,
really no problem! But I haven't pay much for the rugi and the Timor swords I didn't buy by some reason. But I have to disagree for minimum the first two shown Timor swords since I have handled them. The blades are old cut down european blades and the handles are from horn which was very patinated and worn (see attached pictures). When this two swords are recent I don't want to be named collector anymore!! Please have a good look to the shown pictures, I am sure you will change your mind. Until horn will look like this it will need decades. The third Timor sword isn't old like the first two, handle was from wood, I would place it middle last century. And by the rugi you may be correct, like before I would place it from middle to last half of last century. So we agree by this one. But otherwise as you I am very sure that all shown swords was in use at one point of it's history. I can post close up pictures from the rugi as well where you can see patina, real patina, not managed to look old. And I am sure by the source from where I have get it, he was very fair and direct told me that the rugi isn't very old. Best regards, Detlef |
4th March 2012, 10:52 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
Hi Detlef,
All part of the game the agree and disagree. Some people like Audi, I still think the Lexus is better for the money....well maybe not on wet European roads Respectfully I disagree with the dirt covered items in the images being old. The thick covering of dirt and odd looking bristle like hair are my first concerns. A passage associated with the subject. "Wooden sculpture can be buried in soil, tied to an embankment, and thrown into a fast flowing river, broken, fed to insects, smoked, stained, dyed, burnt, waxed, oiled, polished, painted or even given to the dog to play with. Statues that have been buried are easy to spot, as soil will have penetrated into every hole and crevice, sculpture that has been knocking up and down in a river for a few months will look bleached, and contain sand and small pebbles. The last two methods are very popular with fake Dayak material." Gav |
11th March 2012, 04:27 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,781
|
Here a horn handle from one of my badiks in comparison with the horn handle from one of the shown suriks. Artificially aged??
|
11th March 2012, 04:36 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 8,781
|
Here the handle from my kampilan with the remains of the attached hair in comparison with one of the surik handles with the apparently same kind of hair, most proable goats hair. Odd looking? Maybe! But seems to be normal. Or is my kampilan a fake as well?
|
|
|