![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paris - Bruxelles
Posts: 32
|
![]()
Hi! everybody,
As I've been redirected to swap forum, this is just to tell that I have posted some pictures of our exhibition in Bruxelles in this part of the forum. Any member will be more than welcome if they can get up to here for the rest of us, I'll try to give more pictures on the swap forum. for any inquiry about the suits of armour you can open a thread or mail me direct. all the best cedric |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
Here's the thread from the swap forum. Thanks for sharing this, Cedric.
![]() http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=658 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 371
|
![]()
Simply beautiful and thank you for posting it here.
I have to think that in Japanese armor the epitome of intimidation was reached in the civilized world, with the unfortunate person facing the Samuri almost certain to think we was being approached by a demon or even death itself, whle a trend along these lines can also be seen in some Indonesian armors/war coats as well. I am often fascinated by the fact that the katana, often touted as the "ultimate sword" (at least by afficianadoes) was accompanied by laquered wooden and laminate armor, as opposed to the heavy plate armor of the west, with mobility obviously considered at least as important as protection. The armor in Japan, by the way, remained in use longer because their isolationism kept the firearm from having an effect far longer than in the west. Simply beautiful. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
Mike, I'm pretty sure Japanese armor was not laquered wood, rather it was laquered metal plates.
Well, not really sure, just something I recall reading, but can't put my finger on right now. Is Rich out there to help us on this one? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 371
|
![]()
I've seen both Andrew, and in some cases, some of the plates were actually laminated silk of many layers that actually ended up being the precurser of fibreglass.
In some cases thin strips of wood were also laminated with each layers' grain opposite that of the next which results in a tremendously strong and yet lightweight piece that offers a tremendous amount of protection. I suspect that the armor was actually intended more as protection form arrows and polearms than from the katanas themselves, although a certain amount of defense would obviously be afforded even here. Likewise, as far back as ancient Greece, many of the "sculptured" armors representing the physique were likewise laminated linnen as well, something that I was tremendously surprised to learn, which also explains to a large degree why so few were preserved except in art. Mike |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 15
|
![]() Quote:
I think you will find that the japanese used the following and more..... Dog Hide Paper Wood Cow hide Deer hide Iron Copper Brass {Later} Silk Fish skin Shark teeth etc,etc,etc. The great thing about closing the doors to the world is that a society then concentrates and evolves methods peculiar to that society....can you imagine how surprised they were when the Matchlock arrived?. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
Mike, I missed your response earlier. Many thanks for the clarification.
![]() Greyman, thank you for your input, as well. Welcome to the forum. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|