![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,257
|
![]()
Acquired this recently, described as a Luristan bronze sword. It has a grip with a face on the pommel and on the bolster. Fairly thin, prominant raised central rib, not sharp.
I suspect it may not be original, but i'd like confirmation one way or another. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: musorian territory
Posts: 466
|
![]()
id say that's a fake one for sure.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 955
|
![]()
I will flip through a few books I have and see if I find any similar forms - it doesn't bring up any memories. The patina can provide some clues: pale green and "powdery" is suspicious; darker green and crystalline supports hopefulness.
Here is the surface of a 3000 year old Luristan bronze dagger that clearly has seen some cleaning: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,257
|
![]()
The sword seems to have a mix of colours, the grip is mostly a worn shiny black, especially on the side opposite the faces. Parts of the blade you can see the bronze colour under the start of a shined brownish oxidation, there are ares that look like chrome polish was used to clean it, white residue.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,257
|
![]()
More photos:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,257
|
![]()
More More:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|