![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 213
|
![]()
Gents,
Please help to id this marking if it possible. Blade looks like remains of European dagger. Thank you in advance, Evgeny |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,906
|
![]()
I guess nobody recognizes the marking.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Such a pity, Evgeny. It is so clear and no one recognizes it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Chino, CA.
Posts: 219
|
![]()
All I can say is that the shield shape looks like a Victorian wedge. And the arrow with the line looks like a simplified anchor.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]()
with the short tapered tang and the remains of a rivet, is this probably about the blade of a plug bayonet, 17thC.
one could try to find the mark in this category. best, jasper |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
That is surpising news, Jasper ... at least to me
![]() According to authority R.D.C. Evans and also to a few plug bayonets i have and had myself, always we have a pin-tang system, which runs full length of the hilt. Very, very rarely we have a push tang, where a short tapered tang passes through an aperture in the crossguard, the grip added by hammering it onto the remaining tang length, secured by friction or by gluing, a popular table-cuttlery method, visibly lacking in strenght. In any case, no rivets taking place ... at least that i have heard of ![]() . Last edited by fernando; 2nd March 2018 at 08:08 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|