Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 8th February 2014, 11:01 PM   #1
apolaki
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 160
Default Moro kris or sundang?

Hello,

Can anyone tell me more information with regards to type of weapon, pamor, metallic composition, and possible age? It is approximately 24 inches and tapers towards the end, Thank you for your time!
Attached Images
    
apolaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2014, 11:40 PM   #2
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
Default

Quote:
Can anyone tell me more information with regards to type of weapon, pamor, metallic composition, and possible age? It is approximately 24 inches and tapers towards the end, Thank you for your time!
Congrats, apolaki, very nice!

IMHO this is Moro: a Sulu kalis - mid-late 19th c., I'd guess. The lower asang-asang is obviously missing; not sure wether there ever was an upper one.

Not twistcore but an even rarer Moro type of pattern-welded blades. I'd love to see it cleaned and stained!

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2014, 03:19 AM   #3
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,219
Default

I agree with Kai on it being Sulu (and that it needs to be etched and cleaned ).

However I think it is a little earlier, say the early 1800s.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2014, 05:44 AM   #4
DaveS
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 327
Default

It seems to me that this blade looks like it has a lot more malay influence to it than moro. even the pamor looks pretty much Indonesian..........Dave.
DaveS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2014, 04:10 AM   #5
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,219
Default

It is possible that it is a Malay blade, although early Moro kris blades look similar to Malay sundang.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2014, 11:30 PM   #6
Robert
EAAF Staff
 
Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Centerville, Kansas
Posts: 2,196
Default

Hello Apolaki, Wonderful piece. I am not experienced enough with these to be able to make an expert judgement call on who or where this was made but, the overall appearance looks more Moro to me than Malay. Either way it is a beautiful piece and I too would love to see it cleaned and etched.

Best,
Robert
Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2014, 11:28 PM   #7
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
Default

Hello Dave,

Quote:
It seems to me that this blade looks like it has a lot more malay influence to it than moro.
I agree that this blade has a few odd features like the pretty feeble gangya.

However, the scrollwork at the base of the blade does look Moro rather than Malay to me. Also the hilt and, especially, the grip braiding seems textbook Moro to me.


Quote:
even the pamor looks pretty much Indonesian..........
I'd suggest that this is probably because we're not used to see this kind of surface manipulated pamor from Moro blades; examples are rare, indeed.

BTW, Malay sundang don't show this kind of pamor construction any more often either...

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2014, 11:44 PM   #8
DaveS
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 327
Default

Kai: Yes, the scrollwork does look more moro than malay, but the pamor just doesn't look moro to me at all. I think this is a definite hybrid. Not surprising, given the close proximity of these two groups..........Dave.
DaveS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2014, 11:19 PM   #9
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,254
Default

Hello Jose,

Quote:
I agree with Kai on it being Sulu (and that it needs to be etched and cleaned ).

However I think it is a little earlier, say the early 1800s.
I have to admit that my mid-late 19th c. timeframe may be a bit too cautious. However, when looking at the scrollwork I just don't see the quality I'd expect from early 19th c. pieces. While there may have been "village quality" examples in all periods, the combination of above-average pamor with sub-par scrollwork just doesn't parse with me though.

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.