![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 143
|
![]()
I picked this sword up today at a local antique fair ,I paid £100 for it without knowing much about it or its value , I think its a ww2 army issue sword , any information on it would be much apretiated,
thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]()
Well it's far from my expertise, but I think that's a copy.
Did you try to open the hilt? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: comfortably at home, USA
Posts: 432
|
![]()
It's trying to be an NCO sword, but I tend to agree- most likely a copy. I've seen numerous NCO swords, but never one with Kanji on blade, usually just a serial number in Roman numerals. Also the lock doesn't look right among other things.
Rich ------------------------------------------------------- Richard Stein, PhD, FAIC Japanese Sword Guide http://www.japaneseswordindex.com/nihonto.htm |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 135
|
![]()
Chinese fake I think. The handle retaining screw is not correct, the blade should have a habaki (collar) and the kanji on the blade is spurious
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
Posts: 88
|
![]()
Yep, a Chinese "fake." The best possible construction is that it a post-War weapon made for the Peoples' Army - they did use IJA weapons as proto-types. It looks rather solidly made, but the Japanese date Showa 17, or 1942, is spurious. Whoever is making these things is getting better and better.
Peter |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,228
|
![]()
Are there any markings on the handle just above the tsuba ?
Any chance to see the scabbard under the leather cover ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 143
|
![]()
oh well looks ive been caught out , like my dad use to say, stick to what you know, not sure what to do with it now maybe stick it in auction I guess its not worth much ,
thanks for all your replies |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|