![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Why do i always assume that, if a blade has a ridge (even if the other face is flat) has to be that of a weapon and not of a domestic knife ?
![]() I picked this one for less than a price of a portion of fish and ships (as per Tim Simmons ![]() It came with a modern turned wood handle, which i torn off within the hour. The tang is no so 'martial' but ... I wonder what the hole represents, or what is its purpose ![]() A nice patina is present, a possible sign of its age as being 19th. century ? . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 534
|
![]()
Without any expertise on these knifes
![]() But than again it might just very well be the letter opener that was used in the famous letter from Napoleon when he was defeated? ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,100
|
![]()
While this blade seems highly indicative of a dagger, as Fernando notes, there are hunting knives with central ridge (mostly I think with various stag horn etc. hilts) and I would think that curious aperture is likely more for a rivet or hilt securing than any practical purpose.
The patination does indeed suggest age which could certainly be 19th c. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Thank you Jim.
A bit distant from the tang for hilt securing, don't you think ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,100
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|