![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 160
|
![]()
I bought this sword recently and was wondering if anyone could tell me if this is a new production sword or an antique. The seller said he thinks its a new production. total length of 32-1/4" / 81.5cm. The blade alone is 22-1/2" / 57cm. The blade is thickest near the base at 5mm.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 338
|
![]()
Did they make blades like the one in the post above me for local use in recent times, or is this another tourist-souvenir blade?
Does anyone have any more info on this? 5mm does seem a bit thin for an older blade, but the shape of the pira is more reminiscent of what I associate as being the older kind than what I typically associate with newer pira, which I usually see taking this shape: ![]() (This pira was made in 1995 and is from Basilan) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,165
|
![]() Quote:
Hallo, when it is a recent one it has a good trim to look old. From the pictures I would say old. ![]() Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OKLAHOMA, USA
Posts: 3,138
|
![]()
THE FIRST ONE IS RECENT , I HAVE ONE WITH THE HORN HANDLE MINE ORIGINATED IN PANAY WHERE A DEALER WAS SELLING THEM ON EBAY. NOT BAD WORKMANSHIP AND THE PRICE WAS RIGHT THOUGH THE BLADES ARE A BIT THIN.
THE SECOND ONE IS A CURRENT FORM OF PIRA WITHOUT THE LONG BACK SPIKE ON THE HANDLE. I HAVE AN EXAMPLE THAT WAS MADE AROUND 1945 SO THE FORM HAS BEEN AROUND FOR QUITE A WHILE BUT I DON'T KNOW WHEN OR WHERE IT ORIGINATED. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Yes, recently made piece in fairly traditional style. AFAIK, these blades were crafted in Marawi; I'd guess that the Panay dealer also sourced Barry's example from Marawi...
Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 338
|
![]()
Kai and vandoo, thank you both. Whenever I am curious about something, you either have the answer for it, or have answered it before. Great stuff.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|