Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KuKulzA28
so the concern is not so much that they might not work as intended but that they might not all be authentic antiques?
|
Pre-WW2 Moro swords in general tend to be much better quality weapons. That doesn't mean that a kris made in the 1980s, let's say, couldn't do a fair job cutting someone up. At least some of them. The big difference for me would be one of intention, though i do like to collect pieces that might have a solid sense of history as well. Let's face reality. The days of edged weapons warfare is pretty much past. A kris made in the late 19th century more than likely was made to kill someone. One made in the 1960's - present was more than likely made with the intention of hanging it on the wall as a bit of decoration. I generally prefer the weapon that was made to be a weapon.
But for many of us it is a matter of aesthetics. Placing an old kris next to one of these contemporary swords will probably show you this rather quickly. Both of them might be effective at killing, but the antique will most often be aesthetically more pleasing to the eye.