Quote:
|
Originally Posted by VANDOO
I AM FOR CONSERVATION OF RESOURCES ANIMAL SPECIES BEING ONE OF THEM. THE ECO SYSTEMS WERE SET UP BY A POWER MUCH GREATER THAN MANKIND AND WE ARE A PART OF IT. BUT LIKE THE ELEPHANT WE AS A SPECIES ARE UNDER THE SAME NATURAL LAWS.
TOO MANY ELEPHANTS FOR THEIR RANGE ? IF THEY ARE NOT THINNED OUT THE ENVIRONMENT WILL BE DEPLEATED TOTALLY AND ALL ELEPHANTS THERE WILL DIE. THE WAY IT IS CURRENTLY DONE IS A HERD OF ELEPHANTS THAT IS CLOSE TO THE SIZE CONSIDERED TO BE TOO MANY FOR THE AREA TO SUPPORT IS FOUND. IF THERE IS NO PLACE TO MOVE THEM, THEY ARE ALL KILLED AND THE IVORY BURNED. MANY TONS OF IVORY HAS BEEN BURNED SINCE THE BANS"VERY WASTFUL" IT COULD HAVE BEEN SOLD AND USED TO TAKE CARE OF THE REMAINING ELEPHANTS AND PERHAPS BUY MORE LAND.
ONE LAW WE AS A SPECIES CAN NEVER CONTROL IS (MORE OF US LESS OF EVERYTHING ELSE.)
THE MASTODON, MAMMOTH, GIANT SLOTH AND HORSE ARE THOUGHT TO HAVE BECOME EXTINCT IN NORTH AND SOUTH AMERICA LARGELY DUE TO THE LARGE NUMBERS OF HUMAN HUNTERS. EVIDENTLY SOME SPECIES WERE MORE PREFERRED OR EASY TO HUNT BY EARLY MAN. PERHAPS THEY WERE SINGLED OUT BECAUSE THEY WERE LARGE AND FEARSOM OR BECAUSE ONE WOULD FEED THE ENTIRE VILLAGE OR THEY MADE BETTER STEAKS AND FUR COATS  FOR WHATEVER REASON THEY WERE HEAVILY HUNTED HERE AND COULD NOT WITHSTAND THE VARIOUS PRESSURES SO BECAME EXTINCT. EVIDENTLY THE IDEA OF DOMESTICATING ANIMALS DIDN'T CATCH ON IN THE AMERICAS AS WELL. WE HAD THE DOMESTICATED DOG AND I THINK JUNGLE FOWL WERE KEPT IN SOUTH AMERICA. HORSES WERE JUST TOO TASTY TO DOMESTICATE I GUESS  WE HAD TO SEND OUT TO SPAIN TO BRING US SOME MORE. 
GAME MANAGEMENT SHOULD BE DONE IN A CAREFUL, LOGICAL, AND EFFECIENT WAY ANY RESOURSES SHOULD BE USED AND PUT BACK INTO THE OPERATION NOT WASTED. EMOTION SHOULD NOT BE A PART OF THE MAIN PLAN JUST STUDY THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE ANIMALS THERE AND DO WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE TO KEEP THE SYSTEM WORKING AND ALL PARTS OF IT SHOULD PROSPER.
THE BAN IS A TOOL THAT SOMETIMES WORKS AND HELPS AND SOMETIMES DOES NOT. IF SOMETHING IS WASTEFUL OR IS NOT WORKING IT SHOULD BE REORGANIZED AND FIXED NOT JUST PUT A BAN BECAUSE IT IS EASY AND LET THE CHIPS FALL WHERE THEY MAY. MY MAJOR WAS MARINE ZOOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY SO I UNDERSTAND HOW IT IS SUPPOSED TO WORK BUT THE SHOTGUN APPROCH TO ECOLOGY DOSEN'T WORK VERY WELL IN MANY INSTANCES. THE UNEDUCATED, EMOTIONAL, AND UNREALISTIC IDEAS OFTEN FORCE THRU BAD POLICYS THAT WORK POORLY.
FOR EXAMPLE
SOME PERSON OR GROUP WHO LOVES PANDAS BECAUSE THEY ARE CUTE AND CUDDELY LOOKING IS NOT THE ONES TO PUT IN CHARGE OF THE PANDA OR OF MAKEING UP THE RULES. SOMEONE WHO HAS STUDIED AND LIVED AROUND THE PANDA AND KNOWS HOW IT LIVES AND WHAT IT NEEDS IS THE PERSON TO MAKE THE RULES AND WATCH OVER THEM. I THINK THE CHINESE ARE FOLLOWING THE SECOND AND MOST LOGICAL CHOICE AS FAR AS THE PANDA GOES SO THEY ARE HAVEING SUCCESS PERSERVING PANDAS AND MAKEING MONEY DOING IT.
BUT IT WILL STILL COME DOWN TO (MORE OF US LESS OF EVERYTHING ELSE) WHEN MAN NEEDS THE LAND OR RESOURCE WHATEVER IS THERE MUST GO .
MOTHER NATURE IS WORKING ON THINNING US OUT WITH GERMS, VIRIUS AND OUR BAD INSTINTS THAT KEEP US HATEING THE OTHER GUY AND GOING TO WAR AND DESIGNING BETTER WAYS TO EXTERMINATE EACH OTHER. SO EVENTUALLY A BALANCE WILL BE REACHED DESPITE OF OR BECAUSE OF OUR TECKNOLOGY.
BANNING IVORY ON EBAY NO BIG DEAL
CONFICATEING A 100 TO 200 YEAR OLD IVORY MASTERPIECE AND BURNING IT SACRILEGE.!!  |
Hi Vandoo,
Just wanted to speak 'briefly' about the deliberate destruction of illegal ivory.
It is certainly breathtakingly sad to see a pile of tusks going up in flames.
For many reasons.
From the POV of someone who has marvelled at antique carved ivory since childhood I
can see the destruction in terms of potential lost art.
But this ivory is different. No matter what use it was ever put to, it would always carry the stain of being taken in what should be a more enlightened time, against all reason from a species of beautiful and intelligent creatures barely able to absorb the loss of the individuals it represents.
The problem with stopping this trade is of course demand.
I believe there have been instances where illegally poached Ivory was sold on by the authorities concerned and the proceeds ploughed back into conservation. But the problem is still the demand, and legally or illegally sold ivory may well still end up in the same places feeding the same demand, and therefore encouraging more poaching leading to the unimaginable horror of the loss in the wild of these incredible creatures.
The choice to destroy or resell to fund better protection (in often very poor nations) must be an agonising one for those involved. Remember the Tiger pelts a couple of years back?
My personal view is that as hopefully somewhat enlightened people we understand better now than did past generations the issues involved in owning an item made from one of our fellow creatures, and where ever we personally choose to 'draw the line' we must do so weighing up all the issues involved.
For me, there can be no justification for modern Ivory, therefore I would personally not want to own any, and I sincerely hope that there will come a time when people marvel at antique pieces and say 'wow I cant believe they made that out of an elephants tusk'.
I realise that is still (even after all these years) a pipe dream. But I think that if we could stop the trade for long enough that those potential 'consumers' have never known Ivory in any other context than antique curios, they might not see it as a desirable 'commodity' for its own sake.
Rather like other formerly widespread items made from endangered species, which now would be unacceptable to consumers.
I can only imagine the look on my Gal's face if I bought her a fine perfume and then told her after she'd put some on that it was made using 'ambergris' from Sperm Whales! (I know thats a daft example but its the first that sprang to mind)
Changing attitudes is certainly not easy or quick.
And of course the biggest problem (Affecting us as antiques collectors) is the fake antiques trade.
Certainly whether they realise the deception or not, all the while there are western collectors buying 'genuine antique Ivory' items made in China, then there will be a demand for black-market ivory to supply the carvers making a living off of it.
Hopefully if this ban is enforced, they can go back to carving 3000 year old Jade daggers! ;-)
My main worry is that ebay are not going to effectively enforce it.
Regards
Gene