Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Marsh
First, let me say that Alan Maisey has an incredible knowledge of Java. There is no doubt in my mind that his opinion and ideas regarding Java are correct! He has a depth of understanding that comes from over 40 years of in-depth research and understanding of this culture and their history. If he says it is so, then it is so.
Anyone who took the time to get to know him would understand this.
But in regard to the overall thread, PLEASE! There is enough acrimony in the world. Could we discuss the validity, or invalidity of these concepts and ideas, without personal attacks?
If a person makes a dumb statement, that is merely a dumb, or incorrect, statement. It does not necessarily mean the person is dumb, or incorrect all the way through.
So, could we just attack or defend the statements before the principal of this school closes the classroom? There are some good ideas here.
|
I hope mr. maisey won't think that i am discrediting him. I am just offering alternative ideas.
for instance spear-hunting on a horse is pretty obvious that kris cannot be used. That's a valid idea.
I just don't think people in java long ago ran with the antelopes, deers, and wild boars wielding krises or kerises.
It is also possible that they speared them first then used the krises or kerises-- only if the animals were slaughtered in temples as sacrifices since temple swords are used even today in India for that purpose-- I just don't think keris or kris is a hunting sword.
spearing, cutting, stabbing an animal is so not an Indo-budhhist thing-- it is so anti-karma and dharma. that kind of hunting would be overkill.
I hear and read a lot about spear-hunting in malay archipelago but not kris-hunting.