Ethnographic Arms & Armour - View Single Post

baganing_balyan · 28th June 2008, 08:04 PM

there are just too many levels to consider in dating mindanaoan kris.

First, the people of mindanao is not homogenous in language, art, weaponry. social development, etc.

so, the development of kris in sulu is different compared to the one found in maguindanao and the one in zamboanga peninsula.

It is possible that the samals were just starting to use simple Krises while maranaos known for their artistry already used the intricate ones or maybe the tausugs known for their warfare skills did not really care for the design of their krises but their functions and usability.

Muslims in Mindanao are not a homogenous group. The social and technological development in each community also varries.

So I cannot really say that the simple kris of samal made in 19th century and the intricate kris of maranao of 18th century disprove the validity of the simple-to-complex principle in archaeology.

If we date krises according to communities, we will see that pattern-from simple to intricate.

That's the problem with earlier krises, they were all known as moros.

28th June 2008, 08:04 PM	#56
baganing_balyan Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 89	there are just too many levels to consider in dating mindanaoan kris. First, the people of mindanao is not homogenous in language, art, weaponry. social development, etc. so, the development of kris in sulu is different compared to the one found in maguindanao and the one in zamboanga peninsula. It is possible that the samals were just starting to use simple Krises while maranaos known for their artistry already used the intricate ones or maybe the tausugs known for their warfare skills did not really care for the design of their krises but their functions and usability. Muslims in Mindanao are not a homogenous group. The social and technological development in each community also varries. So I cannot really say that the simple kris of samal made in 19th century and the intricate kris of maranao of 18th century disprove the validity of the simple-to-complex principle in archaeology. If we date krises according to communities, we will see that pattern-from simple to intricate. That's the problem with earlier krises, they were all known as moros.