Ethnographic Arms & Armour - View Single Post

Jim McDougall · 24th April 2007, 06:40 PM

I agree with Jeff, this appears to be a military 'mameluke' form sabre for officers, probably British, and from the c.1803 period he notes. The blade distinctly reflects the 'hatchet' point blades of the British M1796 light cavalry sabres.
It should be noted that the British presence in Arabia around the Gulf of Aden was well established and it would seem quite likely that many British weapons were available. Many British officers had thier dress swords furbished in the many outfitters that had shops there (much as in the British Raj in India) so I think Ariels use of the term 'provincial' is in degree well applied.

I agree that the decoration that embellishes this sabre has most likely been added to appeal to prospective Arabian traders for associated markets.

Interesting 19th century piece !!

All the best,
Jim

24th April 2007, 06:40 PM	#8
Jim McDougall Arms Historian Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Route 66 Posts: 10,100	I agree with Jeff, this appears to be a military 'mameluke' form sabre for officers, probably British, and from the c.1803 period he notes. The blade distinctly reflects the 'hatchet' point blades of the British M1796 light cavalry sabres. It should be noted that the British presence in Arabia around the Gulf of Aden was well established and it would seem quite likely that many British weapons were available. Many British officers had thier dress swords furbished in the many outfitters that had shops there (much as in the British Raj in India) so I think Ariels use of the term 'provincial' is in degree well applied. I agree that the decoration that embellishes this sabre has most likely been added to appeal to prospective Arabian traders for associated markets. Interesting 19th century piece !! All the best, Jim