I have not read this book of Hildred Geertz', Gustav, it is perhaps something that might interest me, but to be honest, I find that amongst academics who do publish on Bali, there can be quite wide variation in opinions. This, I personally feel is something to be expected, especially where pre-colonial Bali is concerned.
My own knowledge & experience of Bali comes mostly from people, ordinary working people who might be of any caste or clan and craftsmen and priests.
In fact back in the 1980's through to the mid-1990's I spent quite a lot of time in a Brahmin household --- distant relative --- but that gentleman has now moved into a different world.
I do not disdain writings on Bali, & I have read more than a little of the published material, but when I try comparing information gained from reading, with the understandings & beliefs of people who are in positions where their knowledge could be expected to reflect accuracy, I do find that the variations make it more than difficult for me to form any sort of all encompassing opinion in respect of many things.
For example, the understandings that you have of the use of gold & figural hilts. My own understandings vary somewhat from what your understandings appear to be.
I'm not going to get into a ping-pong match about this, there is simply no point in it.
You have your own experience, & I have mine, I have no desire at all to try to change your understandings.
|