View Single Post
Old 21st February 2025, 10:30 AM   #5
Marc M.
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Belgium
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Changdao View Post
Beautiful swords.

Can I ask how thick is it near the tip? And those measurements for the bigger ones?

I would not discount their use in combat. Keep in mind that the Fang lived in an environment with no armour, and by the time these swords we are actually collecting were made and carried shields were a thing of the past (originally they used square or rectangular elephant hide shields). If their swords were slightly thicker when they had to face shields more commonly, we don't know. Besides, according to Tessmann the warfare practiced by the Fang was low scale and sporadic, based on feuding and ambushes, and small but explosive bursts of violence.

With this in mind, a thin sharp sword excellent for slicing flesh would be useful in this context. And this type of very thin cutting sword is found elsewhere: European medieval falchions of the XIII century were likewise very thin and sharp. The Thorpe falchion is 2.5 mm at its thickest and around 1-1.2 mm near the tip. Another falchion (108,9 cm in total length) starts at 7 mm, tapers to 4 mm, then 3 mm, and it is 1.1 mm for the last 20 cm. The Conyers falchion starts at 6 mm thick, but tapers quite rapidly and it is 1.2 mm in the widest part of the blade. Various Chinese niuweidao also follow that pattern.
From top to bottom, sword 1: against the handle 5mm, in the middle 2mm and at the tip 1.2mm. Sword 2: 3.3mm, 2.4mm and 0.7mm. Sword 3: 3.9mm, 2.2mm and1.6mm.
Agreed that the average Central African warrior had no body protection beyond the shield and some exceptions observed. Shields became useless after the introduction of the firearm by the colonials. Disagreements between different parties were still fought with the traditional weapons in Africa.As colonization progressed, more punitive expeditions were set up to suppress the rebellious tribes. Needless to say, the African was on the losing side. The traditional weapons turned into status symbols and were often still useful but evolved into the weaker form than they once were. An evolution spread over several decades makes it not easy to place these weapons in time, as many have a patina from intense use.
Regards
Marc
Marc M. is offline   Reply With Quote