Quote:
Originally Posted by werecow
So, just from holding this (fairly hefty) yataghan now, it occurs to me that this T section grip is very supportive of the long draw cuts in the style that Matt Easton demonstrates here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfhC_c2Zbh0
Note how you basically drag the blade along behind the hand. A T section grip is very secure in this case because all the force is directed straight into that T. So if I had to make a guess, I would suggest that that T is more or less intended for "dragging" the sword along in a wide full body slashing motion. Of course, the sword curves the other way, and I am not trained in Zeybek swordsmanship (or really any swordsmanship other than modern fencing), so that is purely a (not very) educated guess.
On a side note, I have a pretty hefty Syrian shamshir and a related thought occurred to me; that sword is quite unwieldy unless you make those slashing cuts. When you do, you basically drag the point along after the rest of the blade along the curve of the shamshir and the momentum of the thing feels quite natural and even assists the cut (as far as I can tell from moving it at moderate speed in my living room without any target to strike).
EDIT: Although with this forward curve it does of course feel more "choppy" than "slashy". So maybe my intuition is off? Someone more knowledgeable than I please comment.  |
You are corect, yataghan blades were used in a such way that they would hack with it and pull, same with zeybek like with any other yataghan, some blades are warped becouse of choping with them, but technique was basicaly hack, or hook, or strike and pull, in very close combat just pull.
Shamshir and other similary curwed swords (pulwars etc.) they were more pike meat slicer movement, slashong and cutting in circular moves.