Ethnographic Arms & Armour - View Single Post

Lee · 13th April 2016, 01:55 PM

It is always a judgement call for a moderator when 'watermarked' pictures appear in a discussion forum. A buyer posting the seller's archive pictures in investigating a new acquisition is usually not problematic, unless from a moderator's perspective it appears to be a shill promotion or the opposite, deliberate defamation of a seller. I do not view this particular case as problematic, but members should not expect precision from the moderators in such judgements and should comply with related requests from moderators.

13th April 2016, 01:55 PM	#6
Lee EAAF Staff Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Upstate New York, USA Posts: 926	Watermarked Pictures It is always a judgement call for a moderator when 'watermarked' pictures appear in a discussion forum. A buyer posting the seller's archive pictures in investigating a new acquisition is usually not problematic, unless from a moderator's perspective it appears to be a shill promotion or the opposite, deliberate defamation of a seller. I do not view this particular case as problematic, but members should not expect precision from the moderators in such judgements and should comply with related requests from moderators.