Thread: WOOTZ or SHAM?
View Single Post
Old 25th January 2006, 03:42 PM   #11
Jeff Pringle
Member
 
Jeff Pringle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 189
Default

Quote:
Before this moment in time..... that sword was concidered wootz !!...
I too think this is an important point, and that historically hypo-eutectoid steels were considered wootz - but it also might be that you, me, Ann and Ric are the only ones who care about this subject on such a technical/historical level.
I think we should revisit some of the earlier descriptions of the watering - Didn't al-Kindi desribe several types? One of those is quite possibly a reference to the lower carbon variety. And the sword in the bottom pic looks like it might be of that ilk (just to keep to the initial subject)...
Jeff Pringle is offline   Reply With Quote