Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jean
I agree with David that the organizers were wise and honest by not specifying the tangguh of these krisses  . For instance the kris bethok putut kembar shown on the last pictures is not old IMO (sharp edges, no wear, priests carving in modern style, new pamor creation, hilt style, etc). But I also agree that many pieces are beautiful and nicely made although too precious for my taste 
Regards |
I guess so, and other stereotype, which stated that kamardikan keris is bad and lack supernatural powers, thus considered as junk blades ...
whilst I consider keris as art object and deserved to be preserved for future generations
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey
When a tangguh is nominated for something, it is very often an opinion, sometimes just about everybody will agree with the opinion, other times nobody except the person who gave the tangguh will ever have heard of it.
Some people interpret tangguh as "style", other people interpret it as "period", or "era".
I feel that possibly the organisers of this exhibition were wise to avoid offering information on tangguh. At other exhibitions I have seen very recent keris identified as "Mataram" and Majapahit" & etc.
|
I myself never bother about tangguh as I found it too confusing and even an expert here can and will still make mistakes in terms of tangguh ...
I just enjoy the blade ...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David
Nice to see such beautiful work. It could be that they did not both with tangguh since so many of these are contemporary creations...  |
yeah, agree with that ... many are new keris, and several are oversized ones
too bad that representatives from Kalimantan (Borneo), Sulawesi and Sumatra already dismantling their exhibit during my visit ...